2020 NISSAN JUKE TEKNA + DIG-T1.0L PETROL

This Nissan Juke has maintained a clean MOT record for the majority of its service history, with only the most recent test in May 2026 revealing two minor advisories—slight play in the offside front track rod end ball joint and light cracking on both rear tyres. The absence of any major defects or failures in the preceding four tests, spanning from May 2022 to April 2025, suggests the vehicle has been well maintained in terms of critical safety components. The track rod end advisory, while not yet a failure, indicates potential early wear in the front suspension, which should be checked for further play or looseness. The tyre cracking is a common issue with age but remains superficial at this stage. Overall, the trend is stable, with no signs of worsening mechanical or structural concerns. The mileage accumulation of 6,233 miles per year over six years aligns closely with typical usage for a vehicle of this age, reflecting neither excessive wear nor prolonged neglect. The recorded mileages—rising steadily from 13,310 miles in May 2022 to 37,396 miles in May 2026—show consistent, moderate use without abrupt jumps or prolonged stagnation. This pattern implies the Juke has not been subjected to harsh driving conditions or left unused for extended periods, both of which could accelerate component degradation. The lack of defects in earlier tests further supports the idea that the car has been serviced or driven responsibly, avoiding the kind of rapid deterioration seen in vehicles with irregular maintenance or high annual mileage. For a prospective buyer, the primary focus should be the front suspension, particularly the track rod end ball joint on the offside. A thorough inspection should verify whether the play has progressed since the May 2026 test, as excessive movement can lead to alignment issues or even joint failure. The rear tyres, while only showing light cracking, should be checked for uneven wear or embedded debris, which could indicate alignment problems or suspension wear. Beyond these, the brakes, coil springs, and binding calipers—common failure points in this model—appear unremarkable based on the MOT history, though a test drive would be prudent to confirm responsiveness. Structural corrosion is not mentioned in any test, but a close examination of wheel arches, sills, and underbody panels is advisable, as rust can develop between MOT intervals. The absence of advisories on exhaust emissions or fluid leaks also suggests no hidden concerns in those areas.