DVLA verified
Check service history

SEAT TOLEDO2013 · 1.6L DIESEL

DF13 XYW

Vehicle Insight Summary

With 171,056 miles recorded, this RED 2013 SEAT TOLEDO runs on DIESEL with a 1598cc engine. MOT is not on record and tax is unpaid.

MOT
Expired
Expires 25/08/2018
Tax
Untaxed
Expires 16/05/2018
Fuel
DIESEL
Year
2013
Engine
1598cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents a concerning maintenance history that suggests reactive rather than proactive care. While the car passed its recorded test in August 2017 at 171,056 miles, this followed a significant failure just one day prior at 170,929 miles. That failure revealed multiple critical suspension issues, including a serious shock absorber leak and deteriorated rubber bushes on both front suspension arms. Given that no MOT records exist for the subsequent nine years, the current roadworthiness of the vehicle is unknown and likely degraded significantly since the last recorded inspection. The mileage accumulation is exceptionally high for a thirteen-year-old vehicle, averaging over 13,000 miles per year. Between August 2016 at 127,032 miles and August 2017 at 171,056 miles, the car covered 44,024 miles in a single year. This rapid rate of use indicates heavy motorway exposure, which typically accelerates wear on the drivetrain, turbo components, and suspension geometry. The lack of testing data since 2017 suggests the vehicle has either sat stationary for a long period or been operated without legal certification, both of which increase the risk of hidden mechanical failure and perished components. A buyer must prioritise a thorough physical inspection of the front suspension and steering. The history shows a recurring pattern with track rod ends and arm bushes, which should be checked for play or excessive movement. The CV joint gaiters also require scrutiny for tears or grease leakage, as these were previously flagged as points of concern. Given the high mileage and the age of the vehicle, a structural check of the chassis for corrosion and an assessment of the brake fluid condition and disc thickness are essential before any purchase.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

50
/ 100 · Below Average

Public record health check: Below Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (67%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 50 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for DF13XYW

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: Jun 4, 2026, 08:37 AM
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents a concerning maintenance history that suggests reactive rather than proactive care. While the car passed its recorded test in August 2017 at 171,056 miles, this followed a significant failure just one day prior at 170,929 miles. That failure revealed multiple critical suspension issues, including a serious shock absorber leak and deteriorated rubber bushes on both front suspension arms. Given that no MOT records exist for the subsequent nine years, the current roadworthiness of the vehicle is unknown and likely degraded significantly since the last recorded inspection. The mileage accumulation is exceptionally high for a thirteen-year-old vehicle, averaging over 13,000 miles per year. Between August 2016 at 127,032 miles and August 2017 at 171,056 miles, the car covered 44,024 miles in a single year. This rapid rate of use indicates heavy motorway exposure, which typically accelerates wear on the drivetrain, turbo components, and suspension geometry. The lack of testing data since 2017 suggests the vehicle has either sat stationary for a long period or been operated without legal certification, both of which increase the risk of hidden mechanical failure and perished components. A buyer must prioritise a thorough physical inspection of the front suspension and steering. The history shows a recurring pattern with track rod ends and arm bushes, which should be checked for play or excessive movement. The CV joint gaiters also require scrutiny for tears or grease leakage, as these were previously flagged as points of concern. Given the high mileage and the age of the vehicle, a structural check of the chassis for corrosion and an assessment of the brake fluid condition and disc thickness are essential before any purchase.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Our records for this Seat Toledo (DF13 XYW) from 2013 show a total of 3 MOT tests between August 2016 and August 2017.

With 2 passes and 1 failures, the lifetime MOT pass rate stands at 67%. This is an average MOT record. Some attention to recurring issues may be beneficial.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Suspension (4 issues), Lighting (2 issues), Tyres (1 issue), Steering (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 5 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 4 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Nearside Front Inner Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)”; “Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)”; “Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY