DVLA verified

LAND ROVER DEFENDER1988 · 2.5L DIESEL

F506 KCD

Vehicle Insight Summary

Considering this 1988 LAND ROVER DEFENDER? It's a DIESEL with a 2494cc engine showing 88,333 miles. MOT is not recorded and it's not currently taxed. View the full DVLA history below.

MOT
Expired
Expires 22/11/2007
Tax
SORN
Statutory Off Road Notification
Fuel
DIESEL
Year
1988
Engine
2494cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The most recent MOT record dates from 23 November 2006, meaning this Defender has held no verified roadworthiness certificate for nearly twenty years as of June 2026. The vehicle last passed at 88,333 miles, but the preceding failure on 17 October 2006 at 88,327 miles reveals a pattern of unresolved mechanical deterioration rather than a stable or improving maintenance trend. Multiple defects carried over between the two tests, including a warped offside front brake disc, front brake imbalance, perished front flexible brake hoses, oil leaks from the engine and power steering system, and play in front axle tie bar bushes and rear wishbone ball joints. The tester also flagged a missing front propshaft and a missing offside rear suspension bump stop, both of which represent significant structural and safety concerns that were never formally retested or confirmed as rectified. The recorded mileage of 88,333 miles across approximately 38 years averages roughly 2,325 miles per year, which is exceptionally low for a working Defender of this era. The two tests in late 2006 show only six miles of use between the failure and the pass, suggesting the vehicle may have been submitted for retest almost immediately with minimal genuine repair work completed. There is no subsequent MOT record to confirm whether the identified faults were ever properly addressed, and the two-decade gap in testing raises serious questions about how the vehicle has been stored, used, or neglected since. A buyer should treat this vehicle as unroadworthy until a full mechanical inspection is completed. The front braking system demands particular attention, given the warped disc, imbalance readings, and perished flexible hoses documented in both 2006 tests. The missing front propshaft is a critical drivetrain defect that would render the vehicle undriveable in its reported state, and the missing rear bump stop suggests the rear suspension has been operating without proper travel limitation, risking shock absorber damage and structural stress to the chassis. The play in the front axle tie bar bushes and rear wishbone ball joint points to worn suspension geometry, which will affect steering precision and tyre wear if left unresolved. Beyond the flagged items, a thorough inspection should focus on structural corrosion, particularly around the chassis outriggers, bulkhead, and door frames, as a vehicle of this age with prolonged standing is highly susceptible to hidden rust. The oil leaks from the top of the engine and power steering system may have worsened over two decades of inactivity, potentially causing seal degradation and fluid contamination of nearby components. The seat belt damage noted in both tests also raises questions about occupant restraint integrity and should be verified before any road use.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

25
/ 100 · Poor

Public record health check: Poor.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
! Tax Status Unknown
! Average MOT pass rate (50%)
✗ 2 dangerous defects found recently
A score of 25 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for F506KCD

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The most recent MOT record dates from 23 November 2006, meaning this Defender has held no verified roadworthiness certificate for nearly twenty years as of June 2026. The vehicle last passed at 88,333 miles, but the preceding failure on 17 October 2006 at 88,327 miles reveals a pattern of unresolved mechanical deterioration rather than a stable or improving maintenance trend. Multiple defects carried over between the two tests, including a warped offside front brake disc, front brake imbalance, perished front flexible brake hoses, oil leaks from the engine and power steering system, and play in front axle tie bar bushes and rear wishbone ball joints. The tester also flagged a missing front propshaft and a missing offside rear suspension bump stop, both of which represent significant structural and safety concerns that were never formally retested or confirmed as rectified. The recorded mileage of 88,333 miles across approximately 38 years averages roughly 2,325 miles per year, which is exceptionally low for a working Defender of this era. The two tests in late 2006 show only six miles of use between the failure and the pass, suggesting the vehicle may have been submitted for retest almost immediately with minimal genuine repair work completed. There is no subsequent MOT record to confirm whether the identified faults were ever properly addressed, and the two-decade gap in testing raises serious questions about how the vehicle has been stored, used, or neglected since. A buyer should treat this vehicle as unroadworthy until a full mechanical inspection is completed. The front braking system demands particular attention, given the warped disc, imbalance readings, and perished flexible hoses documented in both 2006 tests. The missing front propshaft is a critical drivetrain defect that would render the vehicle undriveable in its reported state, and the missing rear bump stop suggests the rear suspension has been operating without proper travel limitation, risking shock absorber damage and structural stress to the chassis. The play in the front axle tie bar bushes and rear wishbone ball joint points to worn suspension geometry, which will affect steering precision and tyre wear if left unresolved. Beyond the flagged items, a thorough inspection should focus on structural corrosion, particularly around the chassis outriggers, bulkhead, and door frames, as a vehicle of this age with prolonged standing is highly susceptible to hidden rust. The oil leaks from the top of the engine and power steering system may have worsened over two decades of inactivity, potentially causing seal degradation and fluid contamination of nearby components. The seat belt damage noted in both tests also raises questions about occupant restraint integrity and should be verified before any road use.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

This 1988 Land Rover Defender (F506 KCD) has a recorded MOT history spanning from October 2006 to November 2006, with 2 MOT tests on record.

With 1 passes and 1 failures, the lifetime MOT pass rate stands at 50%. This pass rate is below average and potential buyers should investigate the failure history carefully.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Steering (5 issues), Brakes (5 issues), Lighting (3 issues), Windscreen (1 issue), Suspension (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 3 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 8 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)”; “Nearside Upper Axle swivel joint has excessive play (2.5.A.3b)”; “Front Steering column universal joint has excessive play (2.1.5)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY