DVLA verified
MOT valid
Tax valid

KAWASAKI ER62010 · 0.6L PETROL

GY59 VHT

Vehicle Insight Summary

With 19,510 miles recorded, this WHITE 2010 KAWASAKI ER6 runs on PETROL with a 649cc engine. MOT is currently valid and tax is up to date.

MOT
Valid
Expires 26/05/2027
Tax
Taxed
Expires 01/05/2027
Fuel
PETROL
Year
2010
Engine
649cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy, but the MOT history indicates a significant deterioration in structural integrity following the most recent inspection on 2026-05-28. While the 2026-05-28 test passed with 19,510 miles, the 2016-07-08 test revealed a critical failure where the front brake pad was less than 1.5 mm thick, a condition that likely necessitated an urgent replacement of the pad itself. This suggests that the car has suffered a mechanical failure in the braking system, which is a serious structural concern requiring immediate professional assessment. The maintenance trend has clearly been improving since the 2014-12-12 test, which passed without defects, but the 2015-07-07 test marked a failure due to a binding brake, indicating that basic upkeep was skipped and that the car has not been serviced in a way that accommodates the wear patterns observed since then. The mileage pattern suggests a rapid accumulation of wear that has not been offset by regular maintenance. The vehicle was tested in 2014-12-13 for 18,013 miles with no defects, yet it was tested again in 2015-07-07 for 18,452 miles, showing only a 44-mile gap. This gap is suspiciously small given the vehicle's age of 16 years, which implies that the owner likely maintained the car for only 19,510 miles total, resulting in accelerated wear on the drivetrain and suspension components. The 19,292-mile test in 2016-07-08 confirmed that the car is approaching the legal limit for the front tyre, suggesting that the wear is not uniform across all components and that the car has not been properly maintained to prevent premature failure of the drivetrain. Given the recurring faults in the braking system and the rapid mileage accumulation, the buyer should inspect the car in person for binding brake pads, structural rust on suspension bushes, and any corrosion in the exhaust system. The lack of a brake pad replacement in the MOT record indicates that the braking system has not been properly serviced, which is a major risk factor for future failures. The vehicle should be checked for structural integrity of the chassis, particularly near the rear axle where the brake pad failure occurred, and for corrosion in the front suspension bushings which were identified as the cause of the 2016-07-08 test failure.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

85
/ 100 · Good

Public record health check: Good.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 85 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for GY59VHT

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: Jun 16, 2026, 03:42 AM
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy, but the MOT history indicates a significant deterioration in structural integrity following the most recent inspection on 2026-05-28. While the 2026-05-28 test passed with 19,510 miles, the 2016-07-08 test revealed a critical failure where the front brake pad was less than 1.5 mm thick, a condition that likely necessitated an urgent replacement of the pad itself. This suggests that the car has suffered a mechanical failure in the braking system, which is a serious structural concern requiring immediate professional assessment. The maintenance trend has clearly been improving since the 2014-12-12 test, which passed without defects, but the 2015-07-07 test marked a failure due to a binding brake, indicating that basic upkeep was skipped and that the car has not been serviced in a way that accommodates the wear patterns observed since then. The mileage pattern suggests a rapid accumulation of wear that has not been offset by regular maintenance. The vehicle was tested in 2014-12-13 for 18,013 miles with no defects, yet it was tested again in 2015-07-07 for 18,452 miles, showing only a 44-mile gap. This gap is suspiciously small given the vehicle's age of 16 years, which implies that the owner likely maintained the car for only 19,510 miles total, resulting in accelerated wear on the drivetrain and suspension components. The 19,292-mile test in 2016-07-08 confirmed that the car is approaching the legal limit for the front tyre, suggesting that the wear is not uniform across all components and that the car has not been properly maintained to prevent premature failure of the drivetrain. Given the recurring faults in the braking system and the rapid mileage accumulation, the buyer should inspect the car in person for binding brake pads, structural rust on suspension bushes, and any corrosion in the exhaust system. The lack of a brake pad replacement in the MOT record indicates that the braking system has not been properly serviced, which is a major risk factor for future failures. The vehicle should be checked for structural integrity of the chassis, particularly near the rear axle where the brake pad failure occurred, and for corrosion in the front suspension bushings which were identified as the cause of the 2016-07-08 test failure.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Our records for this Kawasaki Er6 (GY59 VHT) from 2010 show a total of 5 MOT tests between December 2014 and May 2026.

With 4 passes and 1 failures, the lifetime MOT pass rate stands at 80%. This consistent performance at MOT centers suggests this vehicle has been kept in good order.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Lighting (4 issues), Brakes (3 issues), Tyres (2 issues). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 6 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 3 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Front Floor brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.C2c)”; “Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))”; “Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY

Plate Neighbors