Official DVLA Record
MOT Valid
Road Tax Paid

2006 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER3.6L Diesel

J1 PMG

Considering this 2006 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER? It's a Diesel with a 3628cc engine showing 207,247 miles. MOT is valid and it's taxed for the road. View the full DVLA history below.

MOT Status
Valid
Valid until 31/08/2026
Tax Status
Taxed
Tax due 01/06/2027
Fuel Type
Diesel
Year
2006
Engine
3628cc
Mechanical Assessment
The vehicle holds a valid MOT pass certificate dated 2 September 2025 at 207,247 miles, but the maintenance trend is clearly worsening. The pass followed a failure just five days earlier on 28 August 2025 at 207,239 miles, where the tester identified a seriously weakened nearside rear upper suspension arm. That defect was rectified before the retest, yet the pass certificate still carries advisories for a corroded rear sub-frame, surface corrosion across all rear suspension arms, and brake pipe corrosion. A further failure on 1 July 2025 at 207,219 miles revealed far more severe structural concerns, including corrosion to both nearside and offside rear inner sills to the extent that structural rigidity was significantly reduced, a seriously weakened nearside rear sub-frame, a deteriorated centre prop shaft coupling, exposed ply on the nearside front tyre, a deep cut reaching the cords on the nearside rear tyre, a binding nearside front service brake, front brake pads below 1.5 mm, and corroded brake pipes on both sides. The pattern shows a vehicle that has deteriorated materially over a short period, with corrosion and wear defects escalating from advisory-level surface corrosion to serious structural and safety-critical failures within a matter of weeks. The mileage accumulation is broadly consistent with the vehicle's age. At roughly 10,362 miles per year over twenty years, the annual distance covered sits within a normal range for a vehicle of this type. The record shows a gap of approximately eight months between the May 2024 test at 199,175 miles and the July 2025 failure at 207,219 miles, during which the vehicle covered around 8,044 miles. That is a moderate rate of use with no evidence of extreme standing periods or unusually rapid accumulation. The mileage data itself raises no red flags, but the mechanical condition at that mileage is concerning for a vehicle that should, with proper upkeep, remain structurally sound well beyond 200,000 miles. A buyer should treat the July 2025 failure as the most revealing snapshot of the vehicle's true condition. The seriously weakened nearside rear sub-frame and corroded sills point to long-standing moisture ingress and inadequate underbody maintenance, likely exacerbated by the vehicle's age and typical Land Rover vulnerability to chassis and sub-frame corrosion. Even though the September 2025 pass resolved the most critical items, the advisories for corroded brake pipes and rear sub-frame surface corrosion suggest the underlying corrosion has not been fully arrested. Any in-person inspection must focus on the rear sub-frame mounting points, both inner and outer sills, and the condition of all brake pipe runs, particularly where they cross suspension arms. A thorough check of the centre prop shaft flexible coupling is also warranted, given the excessive deterioration flagged in July 2025. The braking system demands close scrutiny. The July 2025 failure recorded a binding nearside front caliper, pads below minimum thickness, and corroded brake pipes on both front and rear axles. While these were addressed for the retest, the recurrence of brake pipe corrosion as an advisory in September 2025 indicates either a superficial clean-up rather than proper pipe replacement or ongoing exposure to the same corrosive environment. A buyer should inspect the front caliper slide pins and pistons for uneven wear, check the rear caliper operation, and examine all rigid pipe sections for pitting beneath any surface grease or underseal coating. The tyre defects flagged in July 2025, exposed ply on the nearside front and a deep cut on the nearside rear, also suggest the vehicle may have been driven in a neglected state, and a fresh inspection of all four tyres including sidewalls and inner edges is essential before any purchase decision.
MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
55
/ 100 · Below Average
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Below Average

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
✗ Poor MOT pass rate (40%)
✗ 2 dangerous defects found recently
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for J1PMG

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 9 Aug 2026, 02:00
Mechanic's Historical Review
The vehicle holds a valid MOT pass certificate dated 2 September 2025 at 207,247 miles, but the maintenance trend is clearly worsening. The pass followed a failure just five days earlier on 28 August 2025 at 207,239 miles, where the tester identified a seriously weakened nearside rear upper suspension arm. That defect was rectified before the retest, yet the pass certificate still carries advisories for a corroded rear sub-frame, surface corrosion across all rear suspension arms, and brake pipe corrosion. A further failure on 1 July 2025 at 207,219 miles revealed far more severe structural concerns, including corrosion to both nearside and offside rear inner sills to the extent that structural rigidity was significantly reduced, a seriously weakened nearside rear sub-frame, a deteriorated centre prop shaft coupling, exposed ply on the nearside front tyre, a deep cut reaching the cords on the nearside rear tyre, a binding nearside front service brake, front brake pads below 1.5 mm, and corroded brake pipes on both sides. The pattern shows a vehicle that has deteriorated materially over a short period, with corrosion and wear defects escalating from advisory-level surface corrosion to serious structural and safety-critical failures within a matter of weeks. The mileage accumulation is broadly consistent with the vehicle's age. At roughly 10,362 miles per year over twenty years, the annual distance covered sits within a normal range for a vehicle of this type. The record shows a gap of approximately eight months between the May 2024 test at 199,175 miles and the July 2025 failure at 207,219 miles, during which the vehicle covered around 8,044 miles. That is a moderate rate of use with no evidence of extreme standing periods or unusually rapid accumulation. The mileage data itself raises no red flags, but the mechanical condition at that mileage is concerning for a vehicle that should, with proper upkeep, remain structurally sound well beyond 200,000 miles. A buyer should treat the July 2025 failure as the most revealing snapshot of the vehicle's true condition. The seriously weakened nearside rear sub-frame and corroded sills point to long-standing moisture ingress and inadequate underbody maintenance, likely exacerbated by the vehicle's age and typical Land Rover vulnerability to chassis and sub-frame corrosion. Even though the September 2025 pass resolved the most critical items, the advisories for corroded brake pipes and rear sub-frame surface corrosion suggest the underlying corrosion has not been fully arrested. Any in-person inspection must focus on the rear sub-frame mounting points, both inner and outer sills, and the condition of all brake pipe runs, particularly where they cross suspension arms. A thorough check of the centre prop shaft flexible coupling is also warranted, given the excessive deterioration flagged in July 2025. The braking system demands close scrutiny. The July 2025 failure recorded a binding nearside front caliper, pads below minimum thickness, and corroded brake pipes on both front and rear axles. While these were addressed for the retest, the recurrence of brake pipe corrosion as an advisory in September 2025 indicates either a superficial clean-up rather than proper pipe replacement or ongoing exposure to the same corrosive environment. A buyer should inspect the front caliper slide pins and pistons for uneven wear, check the rear caliper operation, and examine all rigid pipe sections for pitting beneath any surface grease or underseal coating. The tyre defects flagged in July 2025, exposed ply on the nearside front and a deep cut on the nearside rear, also suggest the vehicle may have been driven in a neglected state, and a fresh inspection of all four tyres including sidewalls and inner edges is essential before any purchase decision.
MOT Test History Overview

Checking the history for this 2006 Land Rover Range Rover (J1 PMG), we found 5 MOT results in the period of May 2024 to September 2025.

The vehicle has achieved an overall 40% pass rate, with 2 passes and 3 failures recorded. A lower-than-average pass rate suggests the vehicle may have had periods of deferred maintenance.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Bodywork (8 issues), Brakes (6 issues), Suspension (4 issues), Tyres (2 issues), Lighting (2 issues). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 22 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 11 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Nearside Rear Upper Suspension arm corroded and seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))”; “Central Prop shaft flexible coupling excessively deteriorated prop bearing (6.1.7 (d) (i))”; “Offside Rear Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced I”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY

Vehicle & Plate History

Previous plates for this vehicle