2010 VAUXHALL ASTRA1.9L Diesel

The Vauxhall Astra’s most recent MOT test on 4 March 2025 at 146,695 miles passed without defects, confirming it remains roadworthy under current DVSA standards. The record shows a stable maintenance trend over the past three years, with no recurring advisories or failures beyond the single 2024 February test—an isolated anomaly at 135,844 miles that did not recur. The vehicle has not undergone an MOT since March 2025, placing it just over a year past its due date as of July 2026. While this gap is technically within the 12-month window for a passed test, it suggests the current owner may have deferred the next inspection, a practice that could mask emerging issues. The recorded mileage of 146,695 miles over 16 years aligns with typical usage for this model, averaging around 9,168 miles annually. There are no significant gaps in service intervals, though the 2024 February failure—just 31 miles before its next test—stands out as unusual, particularly since it was the only failure in the past three cycles. The lack of defects in earlier tests implies consistent upkeep, but the brief lapse in 2024 warrants scrutiny of components prone to sudden failure, such as brake calipers or suspension linkages, which might have been overlooked during that period. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an in-person inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear bushes and coil springs, which often degrade incrementally without immediate MOT failings. The brakes, though never flagged, should be checked for uneven wear or binding calipers, especially since the 2024 failure could hint at a minor oversight. Structural integrity is less concerning here, but a thorough examination of wheel arches and sills for corrosion is advisable, given the vehicle’s age. The absence of advisories on exhaust emissions or steering components further reduces risk, but tyre condition—particularly tread depth and lateral wear—should be verified, as failing twice on this criterion in prior years would suggest basic upkeep may have been inconsistent.