DVLA verified

NISSAN SKYLINE1995 · 2.5L PETROL

M138 CTR

Vehicle Insight Summary

This 1995 NISSAN SKYLINE is a PETROL vehicle with a 2500cc engine. Currently it has no valid MOT recorded and is not currently taxed. The latest recorded mileage is 111,300.

MOT
Expired
Expires 16/03/2023
Tax
SORN
Statutory Off Road Notification
Fuel
PETROL
Year
1995
Engine
2500cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is in a critical state of roadworthiness with a clear trend of worsening structural degradation. The most recent test on March 22, 2023, at 111,300 miles resulted in a failure due to multiple safety-critical defects. While previous tests passed with advisories for corrosion, the 2023 report reveals that the rust has progressed into significant structural failure. The transition from surface corrosion to areas of reduced structural strength indicates that the vehicle has reached a terminal stage of metal decay. The mileage profile is unusually low for a 31-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 3,590 miles per year. However, there is a significant discrepancy in the data, as the vehicle recorded 130,298 miles in March 2019 and dropped to 111,300 miles by March 2023. This reversal suggests either an odometer error or a recording mistake, which undermines the reliability of the mileage history. Despite the low annual usage, the lack of movement has likely contributed to the accelerated deterioration of rubber components, brake lines, and the deep-seated oxidation currently seen across the chassis. A buyer must conduct an exhaustive inspection of the structural integrity, specifically focusing on the mounting points for the front suspension and the rear sub-frame. The tester explicitly flagged these areas as having significantly reduced structural strength, which is a terminal defect. The seat belt anchorages have also failed due to corrosion in the sills and floor, representing a major passenger safety risk. Furthermore, the brake system shows chronic neglect with pipes covered in grease, a common tactic to hide rust,along with discs that are now seriously weakened.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

35
/ 100 · Poor

Public record health check: Poor.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
! Tax Status Unknown
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
✗ 2 dangerous defects found recently
A score of 35 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for M138CTR

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

MOT data last updated: 6/4/2026, 1:52:34 AM

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is in a critical state of roadworthiness with a clear trend of worsening structural degradation. The most recent test on March 22, 2023, at 111,300 miles resulted in a failure due to multiple safety-critical defects. While previous tests passed with advisories for corrosion, the 2023 report reveals that the rust has progressed into significant structural failure. The transition from surface corrosion to areas of reduced structural strength indicates that the vehicle has reached a terminal stage of metal decay. The mileage profile is unusually low for a 31-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 3,590 miles per year. However, there is a significant discrepancy in the data, as the vehicle recorded 130,298 miles in March 2019 and dropped to 111,300 miles by March 2023. This reversal suggests either an odometer error or a recording mistake, which undermines the reliability of the mileage history. Despite the low annual usage, the lack of movement has likely contributed to the accelerated deterioration of rubber components, brake lines, and the deep-seated oxidation currently seen across the chassis. A buyer must conduct an exhaustive inspection of the structural integrity, specifically focusing on the mounting points for the front suspension and the rear sub-frame. The tester explicitly flagged these areas as having significantly reduced structural strength, which is a terminal defect. The seat belt anchorages have also failed due to corrosion in the sills and floor, representing a major passenger safety risk. Furthermore, the brake system shows chronic neglect with pipes covered in grease, a common tactic to hide rust,along with discs that are now seriously weakened.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Our records for this Nissan Skyline (M138 CTR) from 1995 show a total of 5 MOT tests between March 2018 and March 2023.

With 4 passes and 1 failures, the lifetime MOT pass rate stands at 80%. The car boasts an impressive record, which typically reflects a conscientious ownership history.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Brakes (14 issues), Bodywork (12 issues), Suspension (8 issues), Steering (4 issues), Exhaust & Emissions (2 issues). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 39 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 12 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced floor to sill (7.1.1 (a) (i)”; “Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength floor (”; “Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced floor to sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY