DVLA verified

CITROEN ZX1994 · 1.9L DIESEL

M841 PRD

Vehicle Insight Summary

1994 CITROEN ZX — DIESEL, 1905cc. This vehicle has 65,564 miles on record. MOT status: no valid MOT. Tax: not taxed. Review the complete history and specs.

MOT
Expired
Expires 18/04/2007
Tax
Untaxed
Expires 01/04/2007
Fuel
DIESEL
Year
1994
Engine
1905cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle’s last recorded MOT on 20 April 2006 at 65,564 miles resulted in a Pass, indicating that the faults noted fourteen days earlier had been remedied. That earlier failure on 6 April 2006 highlighted off‑side rear lamp condition, an insecurely mounted brake master cylinder, deteriorated front‑suspension arm rubber bush, rough front wheel bearing, tyre structural defects and sub‑minimum parking‑brake efficiency. The swift correction suggests an improving maintenance trend at that time, but the absence of any MOT data for the subsequent twenty years leaves the current roadworthiness status indeterminate. A mileage of 65,564 miles spread over roughly 32 years averages about 2,050 miles per annum, which is markedly low for a vehicle of this age. No rapid mileage spikes or prolonged gaps appear in the record; the sole mileage figure remains constant across both 2006 entries, implying light use or extended periods of inactivity. The sparse data set does not reveal any hidden high‑usage phases, but the low annual average does raise the possibility of long storage intervals that can affect seals and rubber components. A prospective buyer should give particular attention to the off‑side front suspension arm rubber bush and the front wheel bearing, as the 6 April 2006 test flagged excessive movement and roughness respectively. The tyre condition warrants visual and tactile inspection for lumps, separations or tears that were previously recorded. The brake master cylinder mounting point and overall parking‑brake performance must be checked, given the earlier insecure mount and efficiency shortfall. Finally, a thorough examination for corrosion on structural members and under‑body panels is advisable, as prolonged inactivity can accelerate rust formation that is not captured in the dated MOT entries.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

50
/ 100 · Below Average

Public record health check: Below Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (50%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 50 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for M841PRD

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: Jun 4, 2026, 01:13 AM
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle’s last recorded MOT on 20 April 2006 at 65,564 miles resulted in a Pass, indicating that the faults noted fourteen days earlier had been remedied. That earlier failure on 6 April 2006 highlighted off‑side rear lamp condition, an insecurely mounted brake master cylinder, deteriorated front‑suspension arm rubber bush, rough front wheel bearing, tyre structural defects and sub‑minimum parking‑brake efficiency. The swift correction suggests an improving maintenance trend at that time, but the absence of any MOT data for the subsequent twenty years leaves the current roadworthiness status indeterminate. A mileage of 65,564 miles spread over roughly 32 years averages about 2,050 miles per annum, which is markedly low for a vehicle of this age. No rapid mileage spikes or prolonged gaps appear in the record; the sole mileage figure remains constant across both 2006 entries, implying light use or extended periods of inactivity. The sparse data set does not reveal any hidden high‑usage phases, but the low annual average does raise the possibility of long storage intervals that can affect seals and rubber components. A prospective buyer should give particular attention to the off‑side front suspension arm rubber bush and the front wheel bearing, as the 6 April 2006 test flagged excessive movement and roughness respectively. The tyre condition warrants visual and tactile inspection for lumps, separations or tears that were previously recorded. The brake master cylinder mounting point and overall parking‑brake performance must be checked, given the earlier insecure mount and efficiency shortfall. Finally, a thorough examination for corrosion on structural members and under‑body panels is advisable, as prolonged inactivity can accelerate rust formation that is not captured in the dated MOT entries.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Our records for this Citroen Zx (M841 PRD) from 1994 show a total of 2 MOT tests between April 2006 and April 2006.

Historically, this vehicle has passed 50% of its MOT tests, totaling 1 passes against 1 fails. This pass rate is below average and potential buyers should investigate the failure history carefully.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Brakes (2 issues), Tyres (2 issues), Lighting (1 issue), Suspension (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

A total of 7 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)”; “Nearside Rear Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)”; “Offside Rear Tyre has a lump, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY