2015 FORD RANGER3.2L Diesel

The most recent MOT test on January 9, 2026, confirms the vehicle passed without any defects, though the record reveals a pattern of repeated retesting in 2024 and 2025 at identical mileages—124,221 and 130,474 miles respectively. This suggests the vehicle was driven between tests rather than left stationary, and while no recurring faults were officially recorded, the retests imply either minor issues that were rectified before the final pass or a cautious approach by the tester. The latest pass, just six months ago, aligns with the standard MOT interval, but the lack of advisories or defects does not guarantee hidden wear. A buyer should treat this as a baseline for further investigation rather than absolute assurance. The recorded mileage of 136,702 miles over approximately 11 years equates to an average of around 12,400 miles annually, which is elevated for a vehicle of this age. This suggests consistent use rather than prolonged storage, though it also implies accelerated wear on high-stress components like suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake calipers. The gap between tests—roughly 12 months—is standard, but the repeated retests at the same mileage in 2024 and 2025 indicate either a pattern of last-minute repairs or a vehicle that was driven until the MOT deadline was imminent. There are no extended periods of inactivity to suggest neglect, but the high mileage warrants scrutiny of consumables and structural integrity. Given the lack of recorded defects, the primary focus for an in-person inspection should centre on suspension components, particularly the rear axle bushes and coil springs, which are common failure points at this mileage. Binding or uneven brake calipers could explain the retests, so the tester should check for excessive lateral movement in the rear wheels and inspect brake discs for uneven wear or glazing. Corrosion at wheel arches, sills, and the subframe is also critical, as is the condition of the exhaust system for leaks or excessive rust, which could indicate prior water ingress. The absence of advisories does not rule out these issues, so a thorough visual and functional assessment is essential.