DVLA verified

TOYOTA HIACE2004 · 2.5L DIESEL

MC04 EUX

Vehicle Insight Summary

With 241,991 miles recorded, this BLUE 2004 TOYOTA HIACE runs on DIESEL with a 2494cc engine. MOT is not on record and tax is unpaid.

MOT
Expired
Expires 23/08/2013
Tax
Untaxed
Expires 01/03/2013
Fuel
DIESEL
Year
2004
Engine
2494cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle's current roadworthiness status is assessed as failing, with a clear worsening trend visible in the MOT history spanning from 2010 to 2012. The most recent test on 2012-08-25 was a PASSED test at 241,991 miles, but this result was preceded by a failure on 2012-08-18 at 241,496 miles, indicating that the engine's mechanical integrity has deteriorated significantly since the previous inspection. The deterioration in the last test is not merely a temporary glitch but a systemic decline in performance, as evidenced by the failure of the front position lamp, rear brake efficiency, and wheel bearing play, all of which were absent or non-functional in the earlier 2010 and 2011 tests. The mileage pattern reveals a distinct gap in the vehicle's operational history. The 2010 and 2011 tests were conducted on 2010-08-03 and 2011-08-01 respectively, with the 2012 test occurring on 2012-08-25. This 12-month interval between the most recent passing test and the most recent failure is unusually long for a vehicle of this age, suggesting that basic maintenance has been neglected for several years. The rapid accumulation of miles since 2010, particularly the 241,991 mile test, correlates with the extensive wear on consumables such as tires, brakes, and suspension components, which are critical for the vehicle's safety and performance. Given the recurring faults including binding brakes, cracked tires, and worn suspension components, a buyer must inspect the vehicle in person to verify the condition of the brake discs and calipers, the suspension bushings, and the wheel bearings. The data indicates that the structural integrity of the chassis and drivetrain has been compromised, with corrosion and wear patterns visible in the underbody and front outer anti-roll bar bushes. The lack of effort recorded on the rear brake in the 2012 test suggests that the brake system may require immediate professional assessment before the vehicle can be driven again.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

40
/ 100 · Below Average

Public record health check: Below Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
✗ 1 dangerous defects found recently
A score of 40 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for MC04EUX

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle's current roadworthiness status is assessed as failing, with a clear worsening trend visible in the MOT history spanning from 2010 to 2012. The most recent test on 2012-08-25 was a PASSED test at 241,991 miles, but this result was preceded by a failure on 2012-08-18 at 241,496 miles, indicating that the engine's mechanical integrity has deteriorated significantly since the previous inspection. The deterioration in the last test is not merely a temporary glitch but a systemic decline in performance, as evidenced by the failure of the front position lamp, rear brake efficiency, and wheel bearing play, all of which were absent or non-functional in the earlier 2010 and 2011 tests. The mileage pattern reveals a distinct gap in the vehicle's operational history. The 2010 and 2011 tests were conducted on 2010-08-03 and 2011-08-01 respectively, with the 2012 test occurring on 2012-08-25. This 12-month interval between the most recent passing test and the most recent failure is unusually long for a vehicle of this age, suggesting that basic maintenance has been neglected for several years. The rapid accumulation of miles since 2010, particularly the 241,991 mile test, correlates with the extensive wear on consumables such as tires, brakes, and suspension components, which are critical for the vehicle's safety and performance. Given the recurring faults including binding brakes, cracked tires, and worn suspension components, a buyer must inspect the vehicle in person to verify the condition of the brake discs and calipers, the suspension bushings, and the wheel bearings. The data indicates that the structural integrity of the chassis and drivetrain has been compromised, with corrosion and wear patterns visible in the underbody and front outer anti-roll bar bushes. The lack of effort recorded on the rear brake in the 2012 test suggests that the brake system may require immediate professional assessment before the vehicle can be driven again.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

This 2004 Toyota Hiace (MC04 EUX) has a recorded MOT history spanning from August 2010 to August 2012, with 5 MOT tests on record.

Historically, this vehicle has passed 60% of its MOT tests, totaling 3 passes against 2 fails. The pass rate is roughly in line with national averages for vehicles of this age.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Lighting (10 issues), Tyres (7 issues), Brakes (6 issues), Bodywork (2 issues), Windscreen (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 3 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 14 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)”; “Offside Front wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.5.A.2)”; “Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY