DVLA verified

TOYOTA HI-ACE1996 · 2.4L DIESEL

N672 TPK

Vehicle Insight Summary

1996 TOYOTA HI-ACE — DIESEL, 2446cc. This vehicle has 193,583 miles on record. MOT status: no valid MOT. Tax: not taxed. Review the complete history and specs.

MOT
Expired
Expires 01/11/2011
Tax
Untaxed
Expires 01/09/2010
Fuel
DIESEL
Year
1996
Engine
2446cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The most recent MOT entry dates from 2 November 2010 at 193,583 miles, meaning this vehicle has held no recorded test for over fifteen years as of June 2026. That is a critical gap. The 2010 test itself was a mixed picture: the vehicle failed initially on a leaking fuel tank, excessively corroded offside rear brake pipe, worn front brake pads, and deteriorated anti-roll bar linkage bushes before passing on the same day after repairs. The maintenance trend in the years leading up to 2010 was broadly stable but reactive rather than preventative, with recurring advisories on brake pads, anti-roll bar bushes, and tyre wear appearing across multiple tests. Without any subsequent MOT, there is no evidence to confirm the vehicle's current structural or mechanical condition. The mileage progression tells a clear story. Between the September 2007 test at 148,285 miles and the November 2010 test at 193,583 miles, the vehicle covered 45,298 miles in just over three years, averaging roughly 14,500 miles annually during that period. That is significantly higher than the lifetime average of approximately 6,453 miles per year. The jump suggests heavier use in its final active years, which would have accelerated wear on consumable components such as brake discs, suspension bushes, and tyres. The record then stops entirely at 193,583 miles, leaving the current genuine mileage unverified. A buyer should treat this vehicle as unroadworthy until proven otherwise. The 2010 failure identified an excessively corroded offside rear brake pipe and a leaking fuel tank, both serious safety-critical defects. Even though these were reportedly rectified for the same-day retest, fifteen years of subsequent storage or unmonitored use raises the strong possibility of fresh corrosion in brake lines, fuel system components, and structural mounts. The tester also flagged deteriorated anti-roll bar linkage bushes on both front corners in 2010, a recurring issue dating back to 2007, suggesting the front suspension was a persistent weak point. The boot could not be opened during the 2010 test, which may indicate a seized latch mechanism or a structural issue with the tailgate aperture. An in-person inspection must focus on the underside and all safety-critical systems. Check the brake pipes and hoses for fresh corrosion, particularly on the rear offside. Examine the fuel tank and filler neck for leaks or perished rubber hoses. Inspect the front anti-roll bar links, drop links, and lower arm bushes for play, and look for corrosion or cracking around the rear differential mount, which was flagged as worn back in 2008. Verify the current tyre condition and tread depth, as the record shows repeated close-to-limit tyre wear. Given the complete absence of recent MOT records, a full inspection by a qualified mechanic is essential before any road use.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

60
/ 100 · Average

Public record health check: Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 60 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for N672TPK

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The most recent MOT entry dates from 2 November 2010 at 193,583 miles, meaning this vehicle has held no recorded test for over fifteen years as of June 2026. That is a critical gap. The 2010 test itself was a mixed picture: the vehicle failed initially on a leaking fuel tank, excessively corroded offside rear brake pipe, worn front brake pads, and deteriorated anti-roll bar linkage bushes before passing on the same day after repairs. The maintenance trend in the years leading up to 2010 was broadly stable but reactive rather than preventative, with recurring advisories on brake pads, anti-roll bar bushes, and tyre wear appearing across multiple tests. Without any subsequent MOT, there is no evidence to confirm the vehicle's current structural or mechanical condition. The mileage progression tells a clear story. Between the September 2007 test at 148,285 miles and the November 2010 test at 193,583 miles, the vehicle covered 45,298 miles in just over three years, averaging roughly 14,500 miles annually during that period. That is significantly higher than the lifetime average of approximately 6,453 miles per year. The jump suggests heavier use in its final active years, which would have accelerated wear on consumable components such as brake discs, suspension bushes, and tyres. The record then stops entirely at 193,583 miles, leaving the current genuine mileage unverified. A buyer should treat this vehicle as unroadworthy until proven otherwise. The 2010 failure identified an excessively corroded offside rear brake pipe and a leaking fuel tank, both serious safety-critical defects. Even though these were reportedly rectified for the same-day retest, fifteen years of subsequent storage or unmonitored use raises the strong possibility of fresh corrosion in brake lines, fuel system components, and structural mounts. The tester also flagged deteriorated anti-roll bar linkage bushes on both front corners in 2010, a recurring issue dating back to 2007, suggesting the front suspension was a persistent weak point. The boot could not be opened during the 2010 test, which may indicate a seized latch mechanism or a structural issue with the tailgate aperture. An in-person inspection must focus on the underside and all safety-critical systems. Check the brake pipes and hoses for fresh corrosion, particularly on the rear offside. Examine the fuel tank and filler neck for leaks or perished rubber hoses. Inspect the front anti-roll bar links, drop links, and lower arm bushes for play, and look for corrosion or cracking around the rear differential mount, which was flagged as worn back in 2008. Verify the current tyre condition and tread depth, as the record shows repeated close-to-limit tyre wear. Given the complete absence of recent MOT records, a full inspection by a qualified mechanic is essential before any road use.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

This 1996 Toyota Hi-Ace (N672 TPK) has a recorded MOT history spanning from September 2007 to November 2010, with 5 MOT tests on record.

Historically, this vehicle has passed 80% of its MOT tests, totaling 4 passes against 1 fails. This is a strong MOT track record, suggesting the vehicle has been well-maintained.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Tyres (4 issues), Brakes (3 issues), Lighting (2 issues), Windscreen (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 6 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 10 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)”; “Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)”; “Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY