DVLA verified

2002 RENAULT CLIO1.1L PETROL

P13 TBD

Vehicle Insight Summary

With unavailable miles recorded, this BLACK 2002 RENAULT CLIO runs on PETROL with a 1149cc engine. MOT is not on record and tax is unpaid.

MOT
Expired
Expires 01/09/2022
Tax
SORN
Statutory Off Road Notification
Powered by Experian Data
£8.99
Check outstanding finance, stolen records, write-off categories & mileage anomalies.
Instant results • £20,000 data guarantee • Same data source as HPI
Fuel
PETROL
Year
2002
Engine
1149cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents a concerning roadworthiness profile with a maintenance history showing a worsening trend in structural and mechanical degradation. While the most recent test in August 2021 passed, it revealed multiple defects including a defective rear exhaust mounting, worn anti-roll bar linkages, and corroded offside rear brake pipes. These issues mirror faults found in the September 2020 test, indicating that the previous owner only addressed the minimum requirements to pass the inspection rather than resolving the underlying causes of component failure. Mileage data is critically insufficient to provide a reliable assessment of the vehicle's usage patterns. The only recorded figure is 25,110 miles in May 2018, which is exceptionally low for a sixteen-year-old vehicle at that time. Since no mileage was recorded for the subsequent three tests, it is impossible to determine if the car has sat stationary or covered significant distances in recent years. This lack of data makes it difficult to judge the wear on internal engine components or the consistency of the service intervals. A buyer must conduct a thorough physical inspection of the rear sub-frame and axle, as the record consistently flags corrosion in these areas from 2018 through 2020. The structural integrity of the chassis is the primary risk here, as rust on sub-frames often progresses rapidly. Additionally, the inspector should check the rear brake pipes for further pitting or thinning walls, given the recurring reports of corrosion in that section. The repeated failure of front anti-roll bar linkages suggests the suspension bushings are nearing the end of their functional life and will likely require imminent replacement to ensure stable handling.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

60
/ 100 · Average

Public record health check: Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
! Tax Status Unknown
✓ Exceptional MOT pass rate (100%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 60 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for P13TBD

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked
Powered by Experian Data

Premium Vehicle History Data Locked

Unlock the full report to reveal outstanding finance agreements, police stolen markers, insurance write-off categories (Cat A/B/C/D/S/N), mileage anomaly checks, and plate changes.

Instant results • £20,000 data guarantee • Same data source as HPI

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 5 Jun 2026, 20:11
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents a concerning roadworthiness profile with a maintenance history showing a worsening trend in structural and mechanical degradation. While the most recent test in August 2021 passed, it revealed multiple defects including a defective rear exhaust mounting, worn anti-roll bar linkages, and corroded offside rear brake pipes. These issues mirror faults found in the September 2020 test, indicating that the previous owner only addressed the minimum requirements to pass the inspection rather than resolving the underlying causes of component failure. Mileage data is critically insufficient to provide a reliable assessment of the vehicle's usage patterns. The only recorded figure is 25,110 miles in May 2018, which is exceptionally low for a sixteen-year-old vehicle at that time. Since no mileage was recorded for the subsequent three tests, it is impossible to determine if the car has sat stationary or covered significant distances in recent years. This lack of data makes it difficult to judge the wear on internal engine components or the consistency of the service intervals. A buyer must conduct a thorough physical inspection of the rear sub-frame and axle, as the record consistently flags corrosion in these areas from 2018 through 2020. The structural integrity of the chassis is the primary risk here, as rust on sub-frames often progresses rapidly. Additionally, the inspector should check the rear brake pipes for further pitting or thinning walls, given the recurring reports of corrosion in that section. The repeated failure of front anti-roll bar linkages suggests the suspension bushings are nearing the end of their functional life and will likely require imminent replacement to ensure stable handling.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Checking the history for this 2002 Renault Clio (P13 TBD), we found 1 MOT result in the period of August 2021 to August 2021.

With 1 passes and 0 failures, the lifetime MOT pass rate stands at 100%. This consistent performance at MOT centers suggests this vehicle has been kept in good order.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Exhaust & Emissions (1 issue), Brakes (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 4 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY