DVLA verified

FORD KA1997 · 1.3L PETROL

P41 UWS

Vehicle Insight Summary

This 1997 FORD KA is a PETROL vehicle with a 1299cc engine. Currently it has no valid MOT recorded and is not currently taxed. The latest recorded mileage is 25,705.

MOT
Expired
Expires 17/03/2008
Tax
SORN
Statutory Off Road Notification
Fuel
PETROL
Year
1997
Engine
1299cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently unroadworthy based on the last recorded MOT result. While the car maintained clean records through 2006 and 2007, the February 2008 test at 25,705 miles revealed a catastrophic failure of maintenance standards. The trend shows a sharp decline from a pristine state to multiple mechanical failures and critical structural defects that suggest the vehicle was neglected before being sidelined. The mileage profile is exceptionally low for a 29-year-old vehicle, averaging under 900 miles per year. There is a significant gap in data between the March 2007 test at 14,901 miles and the February 2008 test at 25,705 miles, where it covered over 10,000 miles in a single year after long inactivity. Such patterns often lead to degradation of rubber-based components and fluid systems, which aligns with the defects found in the 2008 record. A physical inspection must prioritise the structural integrity of the chassis. The 2008 failure identified excessive corrosion within 30cm of the body mountings, which is a terminal defect for this era of Ford Ka if not professionally repaired. The buyer should also examine the trailing arm and suspension arm rubber mountings, as the previous test noted excessive movement in these areas, indicating perished rubber due to age and sitting rather than high mileage. The braking and lighting systems also require close scrutiny. The tester flagged a deteriorated brake hose and a shock absorber with reduced damping. Given the time elapsed since the last test, any rubber hoses, seals, or hydraulic components are likely to be seized or perished. The previous failure of the windscreen wiper blades, headlamp, and registration lamp indicates that basic functional upkeep was ignored prior to the final recorded test.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

45
/ 100 · Below Average

Public record health check: Below Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
! Tax Status Unknown
! Average MOT pass rate (67%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 45 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for P41UWS

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: Jun 4, 2026, 01:16 AM
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently unroadworthy based on the last recorded MOT result. While the car maintained clean records through 2006 and 2007, the February 2008 test at 25,705 miles revealed a catastrophic failure of maintenance standards. The trend shows a sharp decline from a pristine state to multiple mechanical failures and critical structural defects that suggest the vehicle was neglected before being sidelined. The mileage profile is exceptionally low for a 29-year-old vehicle, averaging under 900 miles per year. There is a significant gap in data between the March 2007 test at 14,901 miles and the February 2008 test at 25,705 miles, where it covered over 10,000 miles in a single year after long inactivity. Such patterns often lead to degradation of rubber-based components and fluid systems, which aligns with the defects found in the 2008 record. A physical inspection must prioritise the structural integrity of the chassis. The 2008 failure identified excessive corrosion within 30cm of the body mountings, which is a terminal defect for this era of Ford Ka if not professionally repaired. The buyer should also examine the trailing arm and suspension arm rubber mountings, as the previous test noted excessive movement in these areas, indicating perished rubber due to age and sitting rather than high mileage. The braking and lighting systems also require close scrutiny. The tester flagged a deteriorated brake hose and a shock absorber with reduced damping. Given the time elapsed since the last test, any rubber hoses, seals, or hydraulic components are likely to be seized or perished. The previous failure of the windscreen wiper blades, headlamp, and registration lamp indicates that basic functional upkeep was ignored prior to the final recorded test.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

This 1997 Ford Ka (P41 UWS) has a recorded MOT history spanning from March 2006 to February 2008, with 3 MOT tests on record.

Historically, this vehicle has passed 67% of its MOT tests, totaling 2 passes against 1 fails. The pass rate is roughly in line with national averages for vehicles of this age.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Lighting (2 issues), Suspension (2 issues), Windscreen (1 issue), Bodywork (1 issue), Brakes (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 2 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 7 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)”; “Suspension arm rubber mounting deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)”; “Trailing arm rubber mounting deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY