DVLA verified

TOYOTA STARLET1997 · 1.3L PETROL

P483 GHC

Vehicle Insight Summary

Considering this 1997 TOYOTA STARLET? It's a PETROL with a 1330cc engine showing 259,252 miles. MOT is not recorded and it's not currently taxed. View the full DVLA history below.

MOT
Expired
Expires 02/07/2015
Tax
SORN
Statutory Off Road Notification
Fuel
PETROL
Year
1997
Engine
1330cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents a concerning roadworthiness profile based on the last recorded data point from over twelve years ago. While it passed the test in July 2014 at 259,252 miles, this followed two consecutive failures in the same month that highlighted significant mechanical neglect. The presence of a noisy exhaust, excessive emissions, and oil leaks suggests an engine and exhaust system under considerable stress. Given that no MOT records exist since 2014, it is impossible to verify the current roadworthiness or if the vehicle has undergone any consistent maintenance. The mileage history shows a massive anomaly in the records. The vehicle recorded 25,921 miles in June 2014, then jumped to 259,242 miles just six days later during a failure. This discrepancy of over 230,000 miles in a week indicates a clerical error by the previous tester rather than actual travel. Assuming the higher figure of 259,252 miles is correct, the car has seen typical annual usage for its age, but the lack of data for the last decade leaves the current wear state of the drivetrain and suspension components entirely unknown. A buyer must conduct a physical inspection of the chassis and underside for advanced structural corrosion, which is common for a Starlet of this era. The 2014 records flagged worn shock absorber bushes and a rear wheel bearing with play, indicating that the suspension was already reaching its service limit. The recurring issues with excessive emissions and oil leaks necessitate a thorough check of the fuel injection system, catalytic converter, and engine seals. Furthermore, inspect the exhaust system for perforating rust and verify that the headlamp aim has been properly recalibrated, as these were persistent points of failure in the past.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

45
/ 100 · Below Average

Public record health check: Below Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
! Tax Status Unknown
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 45 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for P483GHC

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

MOT data last updated: 6/4/2026, 2:04:19 AM

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents a concerning roadworthiness profile based on the last recorded data point from over twelve years ago. While it passed the test in July 2014 at 259,252 miles, this followed two consecutive failures in the same month that highlighted significant mechanical neglect. The presence of a noisy exhaust, excessive emissions, and oil leaks suggests an engine and exhaust system under considerable stress. Given that no MOT records exist since 2014, it is impossible to verify the current roadworthiness or if the vehicle has undergone any consistent maintenance. The mileage history shows a massive anomaly in the records. The vehicle recorded 25,921 miles in June 2014, then jumped to 259,242 miles just six days later during a failure. This discrepancy of over 230,000 miles in a week indicates a clerical error by the previous tester rather than actual travel. Assuming the higher figure of 259,252 miles is correct, the car has seen typical annual usage for its age, but the lack of data for the last decade leaves the current wear state of the drivetrain and suspension components entirely unknown. A buyer must conduct a physical inspection of the chassis and underside for advanced structural corrosion, which is common for a Starlet of this era. The 2014 records flagged worn shock absorber bushes and a rear wheel bearing with play, indicating that the suspension was already reaching its service limit. The recurring issues with excessive emissions and oil leaks necessitate a thorough check of the fuel injection system, catalytic converter, and engine seals. Furthermore, inspect the exhaust system for perforating rust and verify that the headlamp aim has been properly recalibrated, as these were persistent points of failure in the past.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Checking the history for this 1997 Toyota Starlet (P483 GHC), we found 5 MOT results in the period of May 2012 to July 2014.

With 3 passes and 2 failures, the lifetime MOT pass rate stands at 60%. A decent overall history, though the failure record warrants a closer look for any patterns.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Exhaust & Emissions (7 issues), Lighting (6 issues), Suspension (4 issues), Windscreen (2 issues), Brakes (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 13 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 7 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Nearside Rear Shock absorber has an excessively worn bush (2.7.4)”; “Offside Rear Shock absorber has an excessively worn bush (2.7.4)”; “Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.3)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY