DVLA verified

TOYOTA CARINA E1997 · 2.0L PETROL

P903 DTO

Vehicle Insight Summary

Considering this 1997 TOYOTA CARINA E? It's a PETROL with a 1998cc engine showing 181,247 miles. MOT is not recorded and it's not currently taxed. View the full DVLA history below.

MOT
Expired
Expires 11/08/2009
Tax
Untaxed
Expires 01/10/2009
Fuel
PETROL
Year
1997
Engine
1998cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle has a current roadworthiness status of failed, driven by a significant deterioration in the suspension and anti-roll bars, which is a clear indication of an ongoing worsening trend rather than a stable history. The most recent test on 2008-08-13 at 181,247 miles was passed, but this date falls well before the vehicle's first MOT failure on 2007-07-12, which occurred at 169,187 miles. This gap suggests that the owner skipped the initial MOTs required for a vehicle of this age and mileage, allowing wear to accumulate rapidly. The vehicle has been tested in the past three years, with the most recent test on 2008-08-13 being passed, yet subsequent failures in 2007 and 2006 indicate that the mechanical integrity of the suspension and anti-roll bars has deteriorated since the first test. The mileage accumulation over the past three years is substantial, averaging approximately 6,000 miles per year, which is consistent with the car's age of roughly 29 years. However, the data is sparse; the first MOT failure was recorded in 2007, and the most recent test was in 2008. This lack of recent data points makes it difficult to assess the rate of wear precisely, though the gap between the 2008 and 2007 tests implies that the vehicle has been driven for a significant portion of its life without a fresh MOT, leading to accelerated component failure. The failure in 2007 at 169,187 miles, followed by the 2008 test at 181,247 miles, confirms that the vehicle has been in use for over three years, during which time wear on the suspension bushings, ball joints, and anti-roll bars has been progressive. In summary, the buyer must inspect the vehicle for binding rear brakes, excessive play in the ball joints and bushings, and structural damage to the anti-roll bars. The history reveals a pattern of frequent failures where the ball joints and bushings are the primary suspect, as the 2.4.G.2 code indicates excessive play in these components. The 2.4.G.1 faults in the anti-roll bars further confirm that the structural integrity of the suspension is compromised, which is a serious mechanical risk that requires professional assessment. The vehicle's history of passing only two out of three MOTs before the final failure suggests that basic upkeep was likely skipped, and the owner has not performed a full MOT since 2007, leaving the suspension and brakes in a state of dangerous wear.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

50
/ 100 · Below Average

Public record health check: Below Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 50 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for P903DTO

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: Jun 4, 2026, 02:16 AM
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle has a current roadworthiness status of failed, driven by a significant deterioration in the suspension and anti-roll bars, which is a clear indication of an ongoing worsening trend rather than a stable history. The most recent test on 2008-08-13 at 181,247 miles was passed, but this date falls well before the vehicle's first MOT failure on 2007-07-12, which occurred at 169,187 miles. This gap suggests that the owner skipped the initial MOTs required for a vehicle of this age and mileage, allowing wear to accumulate rapidly. The vehicle has been tested in the past three years, with the most recent test on 2008-08-13 being passed, yet subsequent failures in 2007 and 2006 indicate that the mechanical integrity of the suspension and anti-roll bars has deteriorated since the first test. The mileage accumulation over the past three years is substantial, averaging approximately 6,000 miles per year, which is consistent with the car's age of roughly 29 years. However, the data is sparse; the first MOT failure was recorded in 2007, and the most recent test was in 2008. This lack of recent data points makes it difficult to assess the rate of wear precisely, though the gap between the 2008 and 2007 tests implies that the vehicle has been driven for a significant portion of its life without a fresh MOT, leading to accelerated component failure. The failure in 2007 at 169,187 miles, followed by the 2008 test at 181,247 miles, confirms that the vehicle has been in use for over three years, during which time wear on the suspension bushings, ball joints, and anti-roll bars has been progressive. In summary, the buyer must inspect the vehicle for binding rear brakes, excessive play in the ball joints and bushings, and structural damage to the anti-roll bars. The history reveals a pattern of frequent failures where the ball joints and bushings are the primary suspect, as the 2.4.G.2 code indicates excessive play in these components. The 2.4.G.1 faults in the anti-roll bars further confirm that the structural integrity of the suspension is compromised, which is a serious mechanical risk that requires professional assessment. The vehicle's history of passing only two out of three MOTs before the final failure suggests that basic upkeep was likely skipped, and the owner has not performed a full MOT since 2007, leaving the suspension and brakes in a state of dangerous wear.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

This 1997 Toyota Carina E (P903 DTO) has a recorded MOT history spanning from August 2006 to August 2008, with 5 MOT tests on record.

The vehicle has achieved an overall 60% pass rate, with 3 passes and 2 failures recorded. The pass rate is roughly in line with national averages for vehicles of this age.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Lighting (2 issues). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 4 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 7 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage insecure (2.4.G.1)”; “Offside Inner Rear Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)”; “Nearside Inner Rear Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY