DVLA verified

TOYOTA HI-ACE1998 · 2.4L DIESEL

R338 DVR

Vehicle Insight Summary

This 1998 TOYOTA HI-ACE is a DIESEL vehicle with a 2446cc engine. Currently it has no valid MOT recorded and is not currently taxed. The latest recorded mileage is 172,956.

MOT
Expired
Expires 18/08/2010
Tax
SORN
Statutory Off Road Notification
Fuel
DIESEL
Year
1998
Engine
2446cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The most recent MOT entry dates from 20 August 2009 at 172,956 miles, meaning this vehicle has held no valid roadworthiness certificate for over sixteen years as of June 2026. The maintenance trend in the available record is clearly worsening. Between the August 2008 pass at 159,604 miles and the August 2009 pass at 172,956 miles, the vehicle accumulated 13,352 miles in twelve months, yet the 2009 failure revealed a cluster of serious defects that had not been present the previous year. The tester flagged a serious fluid leak from the offside front shock absorber, excessively deteriorated brake hoses on all four corners, front brake pads below 1.5 mm, and a front brake disc described as seriously weakened. These are not minor consumable items. They point to a period of accelerated neglect or deferred maintenance during that high-mileage year. The mileage pattern itself is broadly consistent with roughly 6,000 to 6,500 miles per year across the vehicle's twenty-eight-year life, which is typical for a working light commercial van. However, the jump from 159,604 miles in August 2008 to 172,956 miles in August 2009 represents a single-year spike of 13,352 miles, nearly double the annual average. That concentrated use likely accelerated wear on braking and suspension components, and the failure record suggests the previous owner did not keep pace with servicing demands during that period. The complete absence of any MOT record after August 2009 raises a significant concern. The vehicle may have been laid up, exported, or simply left untested and potentially unmaintained for well over a decade and a half. A buyer inspecting this vehicle in person should focus on the structural and mechanical areas that the 2009 failure exposed. The front brake assembly warrants close examination, particularly the disc condition and caliper operation, given the record of a seriously weakened disc and binding or deteriorated hoses. All four brake hoses should be checked for perishing, cracking, and swelling, as rubber components degrade with age regardless of mileage. The offside front shock absorber must be inspected for fresh fluid leakage and the rear coil springs re-examined for the incomplete or fractured springs flagged in the 2008 failure. Corrosion is the primary concern on a van of this age. The chassis, outriggers, sills, and wheel arches should be probed for structural rust, particularly around mounting points for suspension and braking components. The horn, stop lamps, and registration plate lamps were repeatedly flagged across multiple tests, suggesting persistent electrical or switch faults that may still be present. Tyre condition should be verified, as the vehicle has likely been standing for extended periods, making dry-tyre rot and sidewall cracking a real possibility even if tread depth appears adequate.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

25
/ 100 · Poor

Public record health check: Poor.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
! Tax Status Unknown
✗ Poor MOT pass rate (40%)
✗ 2 dangerous defects found recently
A score of 25 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for R338DVR

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: Jun 4, 2026, 03:37 PM
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The most recent MOT entry dates from 20 August 2009 at 172,956 miles, meaning this vehicle has held no valid roadworthiness certificate for over sixteen years as of June 2026. The maintenance trend in the available record is clearly worsening. Between the August 2008 pass at 159,604 miles and the August 2009 pass at 172,956 miles, the vehicle accumulated 13,352 miles in twelve months, yet the 2009 failure revealed a cluster of serious defects that had not been present the previous year. The tester flagged a serious fluid leak from the offside front shock absorber, excessively deteriorated brake hoses on all four corners, front brake pads below 1.5 mm, and a front brake disc described as seriously weakened. These are not minor consumable items. They point to a period of accelerated neglect or deferred maintenance during that high-mileage year. The mileage pattern itself is broadly consistent with roughly 6,000 to 6,500 miles per year across the vehicle's twenty-eight-year life, which is typical for a working light commercial van. However, the jump from 159,604 miles in August 2008 to 172,956 miles in August 2009 represents a single-year spike of 13,352 miles, nearly double the annual average. That concentrated use likely accelerated wear on braking and suspension components, and the failure record suggests the previous owner did not keep pace with servicing demands during that period. The complete absence of any MOT record after August 2009 raises a significant concern. The vehicle may have been laid up, exported, or simply left untested and potentially unmaintained for well over a decade and a half. A buyer inspecting this vehicle in person should focus on the structural and mechanical areas that the 2009 failure exposed. The front brake assembly warrants close examination, particularly the disc condition and caliper operation, given the record of a seriously weakened disc and binding or deteriorated hoses. All four brake hoses should be checked for perishing, cracking, and swelling, as rubber components degrade with age regardless of mileage. The offside front shock absorber must be inspected for fresh fluid leakage and the rear coil springs re-examined for the incomplete or fractured springs flagged in the 2008 failure. Corrosion is the primary concern on a van of this age. The chassis, outriggers, sills, and wheel arches should be probed for structural rust, particularly around mounting points for suspension and braking components. The horn, stop lamps, and registration plate lamps were repeatedly flagged across multiple tests, suggesting persistent electrical or switch faults that may still be present. Tyre condition should be verified, as the vehicle has likely been standing for extended periods, making dry-tyre rot and sidewall cracking a real possibility even if tread depth appears adequate.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Registered in 1998, this Toyota Hi-Ace with plate R338 DVR has undergone 5 MOT inspections since August 2008.

Historically, this vehicle has passed 40% of its MOT tests, totaling 2 passes against 3 fails. A lower-than-average pass rate suggests the vehicle may have had periods of deferred maintenance.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Brakes (9 issues), Lighting (7 issues), Suspension (6 issues), Tyres (3 issues), Windscreen (2 issues). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 4 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 26 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Front brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (3.5.1i)”; “Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)”; “Offside Rear Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY