DVLA verified
Tax valid

JAGUAR XK1955 · 3.8L PETROL

RFO 896

Vehicle Insight Summary

With 13,320 miles recorded, this BLUE 1955 JAGUAR XK runs on PETROL with a 3800cc engine. MOT is not on record and tax is up to date.

MOT
Expired
Expires 19/01/2017
Tax
Taxed
Expires 01/08/2026
Fuel
PETROL
Year
1955
Engine
3800cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents a stable roadworthiness history, though the data is now significantly outdated by over a decade. The most recent recorded test occurred in January 2016 at 13,320 miles, where the car passed with no defects. Given that no MOT has been performed since this date, the current mechanical and structural state cannot be verified through official records, and a comprehensive physical inspection is required to ensure the vehicle remains roadworthy by today. The mileage pattern is exceptionally low for a 71-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 188 miles per year. The record shows minimal movement between 10,483 miles in June 2011 and 13,320 miles in January 2016, indicating the car is likely stored and used only sparingly. While this low mileage suggests minimal wear on the drivetrain and engine components, long periods of inactivity often lead to the degradation of rubber components, perished seals, and fluid contamination which are not captured by a mileage-based wear analysis. A buyer must focus heavily on the braking system, as efficiency issues were a recurring theme. In both the 2012 and 2016 tests, the vehicle failed due to parking brake efficiency below requirements, and the 2016 test also flagged poor service brake performance. This suggests a tendency for the drums or shoes to become seized or ineffective from lack of use. The 2016 failure also noted incorrect headlamp aim, which indicates that basic adjustment maintenance may have been neglected between services. Structural integrity remains a primary concern given the age of the Jaguar XK, as the MOT record provides no data on corrosion in the chassis or frame members. An inspector should check for hidden rust in the mounting points and evaluate the condition of the suspension bushes and hoses which may have cracked during the long intervals between recorded. The lack of testing for the last ten years means the risk of undetected mechanical failure or structural decay is high regardless of the low historical mileage.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

50
/ 100 · Below Average

Public record health check: Below Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 50 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for RFO896

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: Jun 4, 2026, 07:18 AM
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents a stable roadworthiness history, though the data is now significantly outdated by over a decade. The most recent recorded test occurred in January 2016 at 13,320 miles, where the car passed with no defects. Given that no MOT has been performed since this date, the current mechanical and structural state cannot be verified through official records, and a comprehensive physical inspection is required to ensure the vehicle remains roadworthy by today. The mileage pattern is exceptionally low for a 71-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 188 miles per year. The record shows minimal movement between 10,483 miles in June 2011 and 13,320 miles in January 2016, indicating the car is likely stored and used only sparingly. While this low mileage suggests minimal wear on the drivetrain and engine components, long periods of inactivity often lead to the degradation of rubber components, perished seals, and fluid contamination which are not captured by a mileage-based wear analysis. A buyer must focus heavily on the braking system, as efficiency issues were a recurring theme. In both the 2012 and 2016 tests, the vehicle failed due to parking brake efficiency below requirements, and the 2016 test also flagged poor service brake performance. This suggests a tendency for the drums or shoes to become seized or ineffective from lack of use. The 2016 failure also noted incorrect headlamp aim, which indicates that basic adjustment maintenance may have been neglected between services. Structural integrity remains a primary concern given the age of the Jaguar XK, as the MOT record provides no data on corrosion in the chassis or frame members. An inspector should check for hidden rust in the mounting points and evaluate the condition of the suspension bushes and hoses which may have cracked during the long intervals between recorded. The lack of testing for the last ten years means the risk of undetected mechanical failure or structural decay is high regardless of the low historical mileage.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Our records for this Jaguar Xk (RFO 896) from 1955 show a total of 5 MOT tests between June 2011 and January 2016.

The vehicle has achieved an overall 60% pass rate, with 3 passes and 2 failures recorded. A decent overall history, though the failure record warrants a closer look for any patterns.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Lighting (4 issues), Brakes (3 issues). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

A total of 7 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Offside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)”; “Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)”; “Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY

Plate Neighbors

Number Plate Neighbors

View all RFO8 plates

Other vehicles registered in the same batch as this one.