2008 PEUGEOT 1071.0L Petrol

The Peugeot 107’s most recent MOT test on 2025-06-04—just over a year ago—shows a stable but curious pattern: the vehicle passed once and failed once at the same mileage (91,334), yet no defects were recorded in either instance. This suggests either an administrative duplication in the DVSA system or an unusually lenient tester, though the lack of advisories or faults implies no critical issues were overlooked. The preceding tests in early 2024, at 86,700 and 87,861 miles, similarly passed without failings, reinforcing a trend of consistent, if not exemplary, roadworthiness. However, the repeated failure at identical mileage warrants scrutiny—buyers should verify whether this was a genuine oversight or a test anomaly. The recorded mileage of 91,334 miles over 18 years—approximately 5,074 miles annually—is unusually low for a vehicle of this age, suggesting either minimal use or prolonged periods of inactivity. The gap between the 2024-03-27 failure and the 2024-06-14 pass (10,161 miles in three months) appears unusually rapid, which could indicate recent intensive driving after a layoff. Alternatively, the vehicle may have been stored with minimal movement, preserving components but potentially accelerating corrosion or fluid degradation. Without service records, it’s impossible to confirm whether critical fluids (brake, coolant, power steering) were refreshed during this period. Given the lack of recorded defects, the most prudent in-person checks should focus on suspension integrity , particularly rear bushes and coil springs, given the vehicle’s age and mileage. The repeated MOT at the same mileage hints at potential undiagnosed wear—binding brakes, worn suspension mounts, or even minor corrosion could have been missed. Examine the rear brake calipers and discs for uneven wear or binding, as this is a common late-model issue. Structural rust, particularly around wheel arches and sills, should be inspected, as prolonged low-mileage storage can accelerate corrosion. Finally, verify tyre tread depth and uniformity , as the absence of advisories in prior tests suggests either diligent maintenance or a risk of sudden failure if tread has degraded since the last inspection.