DVLA verified
MOT valid

HYUNDAI I102013 · 1.2L Petrol

SL63 ADU

Vehicle Insight Summary

2013 HYUNDAI I10 — Petrol, 1248cc. This vehicle has 68,121 miles on record. MOT status: valid. Tax: not taxed. Review the complete history and specs.

MOT
Valid
Expires 29/11/2026
Tax
No data
Fuel
Petrol
Year
2013
Engine
1248cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The Hyundai i10’s most recent MOT test, conducted on 28 November 2025 at 68,121 miles, confirms the vehicle passed without any recorded defects. This represents a stable maintenance pattern over the past two years, with no recurring advisories or failures beyond the single failed test on 21 November 2025—an anomaly that did not result in defects and was rectified within seven days. The absence of repeated issues suggests the vehicle has been kept in a state of basic roadworthiness, though the lack of advisories in earlier tests means no proactive maintenance records (such as suspension alignment or brake servicing) are visible. The most recent pass, just six months ago, aligns with the standard MOT interval, indicating compliance with legal requirements but offering no insight into the vehicle’s condition beyond that. The recorded mileage of 68,121 miles over 13 years—approximately 5,240 miles annually—is unusually low for a vehicle of this age, suggesting either minimal usage or prolonged periods of inactivity. The gap between the February 2024 and November 2024 tests shows no significant mileage accumulation (just 10 miles), which could imply the car was stationary or used sparingly. This pattern may mitigate some wear on high-mileage components like brakes and suspension, but it also raises questions about fluid changes (brakes, gearbox, coolant) and tyre preservation, as low mileage does not necessarily correlate with consistent upkeep. The lack of mileage progression between tests also makes it difficult to assess wear rates for critical components. Given the sparse MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear bushes and coil springs, as these are common failure points in this model. The failed test in November 2025—despite no recorded defects—warries scrutiny of the braking system, including rear caliper binding or worn brake discs, as these are often undetectable without a dynamic test. Structural integrity should also be assessed, focusing on the wheel arches, sills, and subframe for corrosion, which can develop even with low mileage if the vehicle has been stored in damp conditions. Tyre condition, despite no MOT failures, should be verified, as failing twice on tread depth in earlier tests (if present in full records) would indicate neglect. Finally, fluid levels and condition in the brake master cylinder, power steering, and engine should be checked, as these are not routinely tested by MOT examiners.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

80
/ 100 · Good

Public record health check: Good.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✓ Valid MOT
! Tax Status Unknown
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 80 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for SL63ADU

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: May 16, 2026, 01:04 AM
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The Hyundai i10’s most recent MOT test, conducted on 28 November 2025 at 68,121 miles, confirms the vehicle passed without any recorded defects. This represents a stable maintenance pattern over the past two years, with no recurring advisories or failures beyond the single failed test on 21 November 2025—an anomaly that did not result in defects and was rectified within seven days. The absence of repeated issues suggests the vehicle has been kept in a state of basic roadworthiness, though the lack of advisories in earlier tests means no proactive maintenance records (such as suspension alignment or brake servicing) are visible. The most recent pass, just six months ago, aligns with the standard MOT interval, indicating compliance with legal requirements but offering no insight into the vehicle’s condition beyond that. The recorded mileage of 68,121 miles over 13 years—approximately 5,240 miles annually—is unusually low for a vehicle of this age, suggesting either minimal usage or prolonged periods of inactivity. The gap between the February 2024 and November 2024 tests shows no significant mileage accumulation (just 10 miles), which could imply the car was stationary or used sparingly. This pattern may mitigate some wear on high-mileage components like brakes and suspension, but it also raises questions about fluid changes (brakes, gearbox, coolant) and tyre preservation, as low mileage does not necessarily correlate with consistent upkeep. The lack of mileage progression between tests also makes it difficult to assess wear rates for critical components. Given the sparse MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear bushes and coil springs, as these are common failure points in this model. The failed test in November 2025—despite no recorded defects—warries scrutiny of the braking system, including rear caliper binding or worn brake discs, as these are often undetectable without a dynamic test. Structural integrity should also be assessed, focusing on the wheel arches, sills, and subframe for corrosion, which can develop even with low mileage if the vehicle has been stored in damp conditions. Tyre condition, despite no MOT failures, should be verified, as failing twice on tread depth in earlier tests (if present in full records) would indicate neglect. Finally, fluid levels and condition in the brake master cylinder, power steering, and engine should be checked, as these are not routinely tested by MOT examiners.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Our records for this Hyundai I10 (SL63 ADU) from 2013 show a total of 5 MOT tests between February 2023 and November 2025.

With 4 passes and 1 failures, the lifetime MOT pass rate stands at 80%. This is a strong MOT track record, suggesting the vehicle has been well-maintained.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY