DVLA verified
MOT valid
Tax valid
Check service history

MAZDA 22016 · 1.5L PETROL

SL66 AEJ

Vehicle Insight Summary

Free vehicle summary for SL66 AEJ: 2016 MAZDA 2 (GREY, PETROL). Mileage: 34,964. MOT: valid. Tax: taxed.

MOT
Valid
Expires 24/09/2026
Tax
Taxed
Expires 01/10/2026
Fuel
PETROL
Year
2016
Engine
1496cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy but the maintenance history reveals a worsening trend of surface corrosion and component degradation. In the most recent test in September 2025 at 34,964 miles, the car initially failed due to a structural tear in the nearside front tyre. While this was rectified for the pass, the tester flagged persistent corrosion on the front sub-frame and rear suspension mounting areas. These issues indicate that while the vehicle meets the minimum legal standards, environmental-related oxidation is actively progressing across the chassis components. At 34,964 miles over ten years, this Mazda has covered an exceptionally low mileage, averaging approximately 3,500 miles per annum. This low usage pattern explains the specific state of the components noted in the records. Between 2022 and 2023, the car covered only 1,080 miles, yet the record shows significant perishing and cracking of tyre sidewalls and discs. This suggests the vehicle likely sits for long periods, leading to rubber components degrading and brake surfaces pitting due to inactivity rather than mechanical wear from use. A buyer must conduct a close physical inspection of the sub-frame and suspension mounting points to ensure the corrosion noted in 2025 has not progressed into structural weakness. The tester noted the corrosion was not yet seriously weakened, but the recurring mention of rust across multiple tests suggests a need for vigilant monitoring. Additionally, the tyres should be checked for deep sidewall cracking or perishing, as the history shows a consistent pattern of age-related rubber failure mileage. Given the history of heavy pitting on brake discs in 2022 and 2023, the braking system should be inspected for seized calipers or excessive rust that often affects low-mileage vehicles.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

78
/ 100 · Good

Public record health check: Good.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
✗ 1 dangerous defects found recently
A score of 78 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for SL66AEJ

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: Jun 4, 2026, 10:20 PM
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy but the maintenance history reveals a worsening trend of surface corrosion and component degradation. In the most recent test in September 2025 at 34,964 miles, the car initially failed due to a structural tear in the nearside front tyre. While this was rectified for the pass, the tester flagged persistent corrosion on the front sub-frame and rear suspension mounting areas. These issues indicate that while the vehicle meets the minimum legal standards, environmental-related oxidation is actively progressing across the chassis components. At 34,964 miles over ten years, this Mazda has covered an exceptionally low mileage, averaging approximately 3,500 miles per annum. This low usage pattern explains the specific state of the components noted in the records. Between 2022 and 2023, the car covered only 1,080 miles, yet the record shows significant perishing and cracking of tyre sidewalls and discs. This suggests the vehicle likely sits for long periods, leading to rubber components degrading and brake surfaces pitting due to inactivity rather than mechanical wear from use. A buyer must conduct a close physical inspection of the sub-frame and suspension mounting points to ensure the corrosion noted in 2025 has not progressed into structural weakness. The tester noted the corrosion was not yet seriously weakened, but the recurring mention of rust across multiple tests suggests a need for vigilant monitoring. Additionally, the tyres should be checked for deep sidewall cracking or perishing, as the history shows a consistent pattern of age-related rubber failure mileage. Given the history of heavy pitting on brake discs in 2022 and 2023, the braking system should be inspected for seized calipers or excessive rust that often affects low-mileage vehicles.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Registered in 2016, this Mazda 2 with plate SL66 AEJ has undergone 5 MOT inspections since September 2022.

Historically, this vehicle has passed 80% of its MOT tests, totaling 4 passes against 1 fails. Such a high pass rate is a positive indicator of the car's general condition and maintenance history.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Suspension (8 issues), Tyres (5 issues), Brakes (3 issues). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 17 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 1 failure item has been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Nearside Front Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure inner sidewall split (5.2.3 (d)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY