DVLA verified

ROVER 2161999 · 1.6L PETROL

V341 ESM

Vehicle Insight Summary

Free vehicle summary for V341 ESM: 1999 ROVER 216 (GREEN, PETROL). Mileage: 59,092. MOT: not recorded. Tax: untaxed.

MOT
Expired
Expires 22/01/2011
Tax
Untaxed
Expires 01/04/2011
Fuel
PETROL
Year
1999
Engine
1590cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents a significant risk regarding roadworthiness due to a complete lack of MOT testing for the past sixteen years. The last recorded test occurred in January 2010 at 59,092 miles, where the car passed despite a deteriorated front CV gaiter and a worn rear tyre. Because no tests have been performed since this date, there is no verified evidence of the current structural integrity, braking efficiency, or mechanical health. The maintenance trend is effectively unknown, as the vehicle has vanished from the regulatory record for over a decade. The mileage profile is exceptionally low for a 27-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 2,189 miles per year. Between February 2008 and January 2010, the car covered only 7,672 miles, suggesting it was used sparingly or in storage. While low mileage generally implies less wear on drivetrain and engine components, long periods of inactivity often lead to degradation of rubber seals, seized brake calipers, and fluid contamination. The massive gap in data starting from 2010 makes the current mileage figure unreliable for determining the mechanical state. A buyer must conduct a thorough physical inspection of the chassis and suspension for corrosion, as rust is the primary failure point for Rovers of this era when left stationary. The 2009 failure record highlighted issues with shock absorbers, track rod ends, and wheel bearings, indicating that the suspension geometry was already prone to wear. Specific attention should be paid to the braking system and the master cylinder fluid, as the record previously noted low fluid levels and marginal braking efficiency. Given the age and the elapsed time, all rubber components, tyres, and hoses are likely perished and require immediate replacement regardless of the low mileage.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

50
/ 100 · Below Average

Public record health check: Below Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 50 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for V341ESM

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents a significant risk regarding roadworthiness due to a complete lack of MOT testing for the past sixteen years. The last recorded test occurred in January 2010 at 59,092 miles, where the car passed despite a deteriorated front CV gaiter and a worn rear tyre. Because no tests have been performed since this date, there is no verified evidence of the current structural integrity, braking efficiency, or mechanical health. The maintenance trend is effectively unknown, as the vehicle has vanished from the regulatory record for over a decade. The mileage profile is exceptionally low for a 27-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 2,189 miles per year. Between February 2008 and January 2010, the car covered only 7,672 miles, suggesting it was used sparingly or in storage. While low mileage generally implies less wear on drivetrain and engine components, long periods of inactivity often lead to degradation of rubber seals, seized brake calipers, and fluid contamination. The massive gap in data starting from 2010 makes the current mileage figure unreliable for determining the mechanical state. A buyer must conduct a thorough physical inspection of the chassis and suspension for corrosion, as rust is the primary failure point for Rovers of this era when left stationary. The 2009 failure record highlighted issues with shock absorbers, track rod ends, and wheel bearings, indicating that the suspension geometry was already prone to wear. Specific attention should be paid to the braking system and the master cylinder fluid, as the record previously noted low fluid levels and marginal braking efficiency. Given the age and the elapsed time, all rubber components, tyres, and hoses are likely perished and require immediate replacement regardless of the low mileage.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Checking the history for this 1999 Rover 216 (V341 ESM), we found 5 MOT results in the period of February 2008 to January 2010.

Across its entire MOT history, this Rover has a 60% success rate (3 passes and 2 fails). This is an average MOT record. Some attention to recurring issues may be beneficial.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Tyres (6 issues), Lighting (5 issues), Brakes (4 issues), Suspension (2 issues), Exhaust & Emissions (2 issues). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 14 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 6 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Offside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)”; “Nearside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)”; “Offside Rear wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.6.1)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY