2017 TOYOTA C-HR1.2L Petrol

The 2017 Toyota C-HR has maintained a clean MOT history with no defects or advisories recorded across all five tests, most recently passing on 4 September 2025 at 58,450 miles. This indicates a stable roadworthiness trend with no evidence of recurring mechanical failures or neglect. The absence of advisories—particularly those related to suspension bushes, coil springs, or binding calipers—suggests the vehicle has not experienced progressive wear in critical areas. However, the 2022 test date shows a rare anomaly: a failure at 39,843 miles followed by an immediate pass at 39,844 miles, which may indicate a minor administrative oversight rather than a mechanical issue. The recorded mileage of 58,450 miles over nine years aligns with typical usage patterns for this age, averaging approximately 6,500 miles annually. There are no significant gaps in service intervals, though the 2022 failure suggests a potential delay in testing rather than a pattern of deferred maintenance. The consistent mileage increments between tests—ranging from 3,500 to 3,900 miles per year—imply regular use without prolonged periods of inactivity, which could otherwise accelerate wear in components like tyres or suspension. Given the lack of recorded defects, the primary focus for an in-person inspection should centre on high-wear items that are not routinely flagged in MOTs but still require scrutiny. Check the suspension for uneven wear on bushes, particularly at the rear, where Toyota models can develop stiffness over time. Inspect brake discs and pads for uneven thickness or glazing, as binding calipers—though not noted here—can develop without immediate MOT failure. Corrosion should be assessed around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, as this model is prone to rust in high-exposure areas. Finally, verify the integrity of the exhaust system, especially at joints and mounting points, as leaks or detachment risks are common in vehicles with this mileage. The absence of advisories in recent tests is reassuring, but the buyer should treat this as a baseline rather than a guarantee. The 2022 failure suggests a need for thorough documentation verification, as discrepancies in mileage or test dates could indicate tampering. Prioritise a pre-purchase inspection to confirm the structural soundness of the chassis and the condition of non-MOT-tested components like the driveshaft, transfer case (if fitted), and electrical connections, which are not routinely assessed in standard MOT tests.