DVLA verified

FIAT PUNTO2002 · 1.2L PETROL

WN02 AHD

Vehicle Insight Summary

2002 FIAT PUNTO — PETROL, 1242cc. This vehicle has 51,016 miles on record. MOT status: no valid MOT. Tax: not taxed. Review the complete history and specs.

MOT
Expired
Expires 29/12/2022
Tax
Untaxed
Expires 12/08/2022
Fuel
PETROL
Year
2002
Engine
1242cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle remains in a questionable state of roadworthiness given the history of recurring mechanical and structural failures. While it passed its last recorded test in December 2021 at 51,016 miles, the car has not undergone an MOT in four and a half years. The maintenance trend shows a pattern of reactive rather than proactive care, evidenced by the significant failures in 2020 and 2021 where multiple safety items were only addressed after failing inspection rather than during during routine servicing. The mileage profile is exceptionally low for a 24-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 2,100 miles per year. However, the data shows a significant gap in records between June 2019 and December 2020, during which the car covered over 8,000 miles in eighteen months. Such low-mileage often correlates with degradation of rubber-based components and accelerated corrosion, which aligns with the reported corroded brake pipes and exhaust leaks. The lack of any testing since 2021 means the current state of these critical components is entirely unknown. A physical inspection must prioritise the structural integrity of the seat frames and the condition of the braking system. The 2020 failure flagged a defective structure on the offside front seat, which is a serious safety concern that often goes overlooked or poorly repaired. The buyer should also inspect the brake pipes for advanced corrosion, as this was a recurring issue in both 2020 and 2021. Given the history of oil leaks and the failure of a rear wheel bearing, the engine bay and suspension assembly should be checked for active leaks and perished perished, which are common in vehicles that sit stationary for long periods.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

40
/ 100 · Below Average

Public record health check: Below Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
✗ 1 dangerous defects found recently
A score of 40 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for WN02AHD

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

MOT data last updated: 6/19/2026, 4:16:52 PM

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle remains in a questionable state of roadworthiness given the history of recurring mechanical and structural failures. While it passed its last recorded test in December 2021 at 51,016 miles, the car has not undergone an MOT in four and a half years. The maintenance trend shows a pattern of reactive rather than proactive care, evidenced by the significant failures in 2020 and 2021 where multiple safety items were only addressed after failing inspection rather than during during routine servicing. The mileage profile is exceptionally low for a 24-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 2,100 miles per year. However, the data shows a significant gap in records between June 2019 and December 2020, during which the car covered over 8,000 miles in eighteen months. Such low-mileage often correlates with degradation of rubber-based components and accelerated corrosion, which aligns with the reported corroded brake pipes and exhaust leaks. The lack of any testing since 2021 means the current state of these critical components is entirely unknown. A physical inspection must prioritise the structural integrity of the seat frames and the condition of the braking system. The 2020 failure flagged a defective structure on the offside front seat, which is a serious safety concern that often goes overlooked or poorly repaired. The buyer should also inspect the brake pipes for advanced corrosion, as this was a recurring issue in both 2020 and 2021. Given the history of oil leaks and the failure of a rear wheel bearing, the engine bay and suspension assembly should be checked for active leaks and perished perished, which are common in vehicles that sit stationary for long periods.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Our records for this Fiat Punto (WN02 AHD) from 2002 show a total of 5 MOT tests between June 2019 and December 2021.

Across its entire MOT history, this Fiat has a 60% success rate (3 passes and 2 fails). The pass rate is roughly in line with national averages for vehicles of this age.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Brakes (7 issues), Exhaust & Emissions (5 issues), Windscreen (3 issues), Lighting (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 13 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 13 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Nearside Rear Wheel bearing so rough it is likely to overheat or break up (5.1.3 (b) (ii))”; “Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))”; “Exhaust emissions likely to be affected by an exhaust leak (8.2.1.1 (b))”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY