DVLA verified
MOT valid
Tax valid

BMW 1162010 · 2.0L DIESEL

11 DAT

Vehicle Insight Summary

Considering this 2010 BMW 116? It's a DIESEL with a 1995cc engine showing 64,801 miles. MOT is valid and it's taxed for the road. View the full DVLA history below.

MOT
Valid
Expires 29/04/2027
Tax
Taxed
Expires 01/01/2027
Fuel
DIESEL
Year
2010
Engine
1995cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy, but the maintenance history reveals a trend of reactive repairs rather than preventative care. While the most recent test in May 2026 at 64,801 miles passed, it followed a failure just one mile prior due to a misaligned mirror, incorrect headlamp aim, and a punctured tyre. The presence of corrosion on the rear sub-frame during this latest test indicates a structural concern that requires close monitoring to ensure it does not progress toward thinning. At 64,801 miles, this sixteen-year-old BMW shows exceptionally low mileage, averaging approximately 4,000 miles per year. This low usage often correlates with less mechanical wear on the engine but can accelerate the degradation of rubber components. Between Between February 2023 and February 2024, the car covered only 2,739 miles, suggesting it sits for long periods or is used only occasionally. This usage pattern explains the intermittent nature of brake work and shock absorber misting noted in the records. A buyer must prioritise a physical inspection of the rear sub-frame, as the May 2026 tester flagged corrosion that is not yet critical. This area is a known weak point on this generation of BMW and can compromise structural integrity if left untreated. Additionally, the front shock absorbers were noted for misting oil in early 2024; the buyer should check for active leaks, which would indicate that the dampers are nearing the end of their functional life. The brake system history shows a pattern of uneven wear, with thin pads flagged on both the front in 2025 and the rear in 2024. This suggests the owner only replaces components when they reach a failure limit rather than during scheduled servicing. Given the low mileage, the buyer should also inspect the brake discs for pitting or corrosion, which frequently occurs when vehicles remain stationary for extended periods.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

75
/ 100 · Good

Public record health check: Good.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 75 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for 11DAT

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: Jun 15, 2026, 09:07 PM
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy, but the maintenance history reveals a trend of reactive repairs rather than preventative care. While the most recent test in May 2026 at 64,801 miles passed, it followed a failure just one mile prior due to a misaligned mirror, incorrect headlamp aim, and a punctured tyre. The presence of corrosion on the rear sub-frame during this latest test indicates a structural concern that requires close monitoring to ensure it does not progress toward thinning. At 64,801 miles, this sixteen-year-old BMW shows exceptionally low mileage, averaging approximately 4,000 miles per year. This low usage often correlates with less mechanical wear on the engine but can accelerate the degradation of rubber components. Between Between February 2023 and February 2024, the car covered only 2,739 miles, suggesting it sits for long periods or is used only occasionally. This usage pattern explains the intermittent nature of brake work and shock absorber misting noted in the records. A buyer must prioritise a physical inspection of the rear sub-frame, as the May 2026 tester flagged corrosion that is not yet critical. This area is a known weak point on this generation of BMW and can compromise structural integrity if left untreated. Additionally, the front shock absorbers were noted for misting oil in early 2024; the buyer should check for active leaks, which would indicate that the dampers are nearing the end of their functional life. The brake system history shows a pattern of uneven wear, with thin pads flagged on both the front in 2025 and the rear in 2024. This suggests the owner only replaces components when they reach a failure limit rather than during scheduled servicing. Given the low mileage, the buyer should also inspect the brake discs for pitting or corrosion, which frequently occurs when vehicles remain stationary for extended periods.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Registered in 2010, this BMW 116 with plate 11 DAT has undergone 5 MOT inspections since February 2023.

Historically, this vehicle has passed 80% of its MOT tests, totaling 4 passes against 1 fails. The car boasts an impressive record, which typically reflects a conscientious ownership history.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Suspension (2 issues), Brakes (2 issues), Tyres (2 issues), Lighting (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 8 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 2 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))”; “Obligatory mirror does not provide a view to the rear Interior (3.3 (c))”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY