DVLA verified
MOT valid

2011 PEUGEOT IONElectric

AE11 AMK

Vehicle Insight Summary

Considering this 2011 PEUGEOT ION? It's a Electric with a standard engine showing 52,345 miles. MOT is valid and it's not currently taxed. View the full DVLA history below.

MOT
Valid
Expires 19/09/2026
Tax
No data
Powered by Experian Data
£8.99
Check outstanding finance, stolen records, write-off categories & mileage anomalies.
Instant results • £20,000 data guarantee • Same data source as HPI
Fuel
Electric
Year
2011
Engine
---
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy, though the maintenance trend shows a shift toward addressing age-related material degradation. The most recent test on August 28 2025 at 52,345 miles passed following a failure just one day prior for incorrect headlamp aim. While the headlamp issue was rectified, the persistent advisory for corrosion on the rear suspension component mounting area has appeared consistently since 2023, indicating that while the car is not currently failing, the structural oxidation is actively progressing. The mileage profile is exceptionally low for a fifteen-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 3,500 miles per year. There is a significant gap in usage between 2015 and 2019, where the car covered under 9,000 miles in four years. This low mileage explains the relatively low wear on drivetrain components but often correlates with the accelerated degradation of rubber-based parts. The record shows intermittent issues with wiper blades and pitted brake discs, which are typical of vehicles sitting for long periods rather than high-mile driving. A buyer must focus their inspection on the structural integrity of the inner sills and suspension mounting points. The tester flagged corrosion in the seat belt anchorage area in 2023 and continued to flag the rear suspension mounts through 2025. Although these were not deemed excessive, the recurring nature of the rust suggests a risk of future structural thinning. Additionally, the history of pitted front discs and a lagging rear caliper in 2022 indicates the braking system may be prone to seizing and should be checked for seized calipers or perished fluid due to low use.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

80
/ 100 · Good

Public record health check: Good.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✓ Valid MOT
! Tax Status Unknown
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 80 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for AE11AMK

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked
Powered by Experian Data

Premium Vehicle History Data Locked

Unlock the full report to reveal outstanding finance agreements, police stolen markers, insurance write-off categories (Cat A/B/C/D/S/N), mileage anomaly checks, and plate changes.

Instant results • £20,000 data guarantee • Same data source as HPI

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 29 Jul 2026, 06:33
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy, though the maintenance trend shows a shift toward addressing age-related material degradation. The most recent test on August 28 2025 at 52,345 miles passed following a failure just one day prior for incorrect headlamp aim. While the headlamp issue was rectified, the persistent advisory for corrosion on the rear suspension component mounting area has appeared consistently since 2023, indicating that while the car is not currently failing, the structural oxidation is actively progressing. The mileage profile is exceptionally low for a fifteen-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 3,500 miles per year. There is a significant gap in usage between 2015 and 2019, where the car covered under 9,000 miles in four years. This low mileage explains the relatively low wear on drivetrain components but often correlates with the accelerated degradation of rubber-based parts. The record shows intermittent issues with wiper blades and pitted brake discs, which are typical of vehicles sitting for long periods rather than high-mile driving. A buyer must focus their inspection on the structural integrity of the inner sills and suspension mounting points. The tester flagged corrosion in the seat belt anchorage area in 2023 and continued to flag the rear suspension mounts through 2025. Although these were not deemed excessive, the recurring nature of the rust suggests a risk of future structural thinning. Additionally, the history of pitted front discs and a lagging rear caliper in 2022 indicates the braking system may be prone to seizing and should be checked for seized calipers or perished fluid due to low use.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Registered in 2011, this Peugeot Ion with plate AE11 AMK has undergone 5 MOT inspections since September 2022.

With 4 passes and 1 failures, the lifetime MOT pass rate stands at 80%. This consistent performance at MOT centers suggests this vehicle has been kept in good order.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Lighting (4 issues), Suspension (3 issues), Brakes (2 issues), Bodywork (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 6 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 2 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))”; “Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY