2021 TOYOTA AYGO1.0L Petrol

The Toyota Aygo’s most recent MOT history demonstrates a stable but unusually erratic pattern, with a single failure in January 2026 followed by an immediate pass just two days later. The absence of any defects in either test suggests the vehicle cleared all critical checks—exhaust emissions, structural integrity, brakes, steering, and suspension—without incident. However, the failure itself, despite being a retest, warrants scrutiny, as it occurred at 25,832 miles with no recorded issues. This anomaly, combined with the lack of advisories in prior tests, implies either a minor administrative oversight or a component nearing its serviceable limit that was just barely within tolerance at the time of inspection. The recorded mileage of 25,837 miles over five years—approximately 5,167 miles annually—is significantly lower than the average for a vehicle of this age, which typically accumulates closer to 10,000–12,000 miles per year. The gap between tests is consistent at one year, but the sudden 2,042-mile jump between the 2025 and 2026 tests (from 23,794 to 25,832 miles) suggests either a period of infrequent use or a deliberate attempt to extend the MOT cycle. Such low mileage could indicate the vehicle has spent extended periods stationary, potentially accelerating wear on components like seals, fluids, and suspension bushes due to lack of movement. Conversely, the absence of any advisories or recurring faults in prior tests suggests the owner has not neglected critical maintenance, though the 2026 failure hints at a component that may now be approaching its service interval. Given this history, a prospective buyer should prioritise an in-person inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear bushes and coil springs, as these are common wear items that may not yet show visible deterioration but could be nearing failure. The brakes, while passing both tests, should be checked for uneven wear or binding calipers, especially if the failure was related to a minor brake component. Exhaust emissions, though passing, warrant verification of the lambda sensor and catalytic converter efficiency, as these are often the cause of retest failures. Finally, the vehicle’s underbody should be examined for corrosion, particularly around the wheel arches and sills, as prolonged stationary use can accelerate rust development in susceptible areas. The absence of advisories in prior tests is reassuring, but the 2026 retest failure indicates a need for thorough verification of the specific component that caused the initial rejection.