2005 Nissan Micra 1.2L Petrol · DY05 AEB

The most recent MOT test on December 9, 2025, confirms this 2005 Nissan Micra remains roadworthy at 90,954 miles, with no defects or advisories recorded. The pattern of testing shows two consecutive failures in December 2023 and December 2024—both at nearly identical mileages (84,750 and 87,419)—followed by immediate retests that passed without issue. While this suggests the vehicle was either repaired promptly or had minor, easily addressable issues, the repeated retests within the same calendar year indicate a lack of proactive maintenance. The final pass in December 2025, just six months ago, aligns with the statutory MOT cycle, but the absence of any advisories or defects does not preclude underlying wear. Buyers should treat this as a vehicle that has narrowly passed inspections rather than one with a robust maintenance history. The recorded mileage of 90,954 miles over 21 years—approximately 4,331 miles annually—is unusually low for a vehicle of this age, suggesting either minimal use or prolonged periods of inactivity. The gap between the December 2023 failure and the December 2024 retest (just two days apart) implies the issue was resolved swiftly, yet the lack of intervening mileage suggests the car was not driven extensively between tests. This pattern could indicate the vehicle was stored or used sporadically, which may accelerate certain forms of wear, such as suspension corrosion or tyre degradation from stationary pressure. The consistency of mileage increments (around 2,700 miles per year) further reinforces the idea of light usage, though it does not rule out deferred maintenance. Given the history, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension components, particularly the coil springs, bushes, and dampers, as these are common failure points in older Micras with low mileage but prolonged service life. The repeated retests in December 2023 and 2024—despite identical mileages—raise the possibility of recurring minor faults, such as binding calipers, worn brake pads, or minor exhaust leaks, which may not have been fully resolved. Corrosion checks are critical, especially around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, as standing vehicles are prone to rust development. The brakes, while not explicitly failed, warrant scrutiny for uneven wear or binding, particularly if the vehicle was not driven regularly. Finally, the absence of advisories in the latest pass does not guarantee the absence of hidden issues, so a thorough mechanical assessment is advised.