2012 Ford Focus 1.6L Petrol · EJ62 AAK

The vehicle’s most recent MOT test, conducted on 2025-12-11 at 100,604 miles, confirms a clean pass with no defects recorded. However, the preceding test on 2025-12-04—just seven days earlier at 100,381 miles—was a failure, though no specific faults were logged. This unusual back-to-back testing pattern suggests either a rushed or opportunistic MOT attempt rather than a genuine mechanical issue. The prior history from 2024 shows consistent passes with no advisories, indicating no recurring problems were flagged during those tests. While the vehicle has technically passed its most recent MOT, the lack of transparency around the December 2025 failure raises questions about whether minor issues were overlooked or deliberately bypassed. The recorded mileage of 100,604 miles over approximately 14 years equates to an average of around 7,186 miles per year, which is typical for a car of this age. There are no significant gaps in mileage between tests, though the abrupt 283-mile jump between the October 2024 and December 2024 tests—both at 85,312 and 85,696 miles respectively—could imply either a brief period of higher usage or an error in mileage logging. The consistent testing intervals suggest the vehicle has remained in regular use without prolonged periods of neglect, though the December 2025 failure warrants scrutiny beyond standard MOT criteria. Given the lack of defects in the most recent pass, no major structural or mechanical issues have been formally recorded. However, a buyer should conduct a thorough inspection of the suspension components, particularly the bushes and coil springs, as these are common wear items at this mileage. The brakes, while not explicitly failed, should be checked for uneven wear, binding calipers, or excessive corrosion on the discs and pads—especially if the vehicle has seen wet or salted roads. Corrosion around the wheel arches, sills, and subframe should also be examined, as this is a critical failure point for vehicles of this age. The absence of advisories in prior tests does not guarantee these areas are sound, so a detailed visual and functional assessment is essential.