2013 Nissan Qashqai 1.6L Petrol · EXZ 1041

The most recent MOT history for this 2013 Nissan Qashqai reveals a concerning pattern of repeated failures just before the annual test window, despite no defects ever being recorded during the actual inspections. The vehicle passed cleanly on 27 November 2024 at 98,914 miles, yet failed the mandatory pre-test on 18 November at 98,782 miles—just 132 miles earlier—before repeating this cycle in January 2026. The lack of specific fault codes in these failures suggests either a deliberate attempt to circumvent the MOT process or an oversight in addressing minor issues that escalate into test-day failures. This behaviour does not indicate mechanical reliability but rather a pattern of deferred maintenance or inconsistent upkeep. The recorded mileage of 104,877 miles over 13 years aligns with typical usage for this age, averaging around 8,067 miles annually. However, the clustering of tests in November 2024 and January 2026—with just 6,000 miles between the November 2024 pass and the January 2026 failures—implies either a period of reduced driving or a deliberate delay in scheduling the MOT. The abrupt jump from 98,914 to 104,877 miles between November 2024 and January 2026 (5,963 miles in ~2 months) suggests active use, but the repeated failures before each pass point to a lack of proactive servicing rather than severe neglect. Given this history, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension components, particularly the rear suspension bushes and coil springs, as these are common failure points in Qashqai models of this era. The repeated near-failures also warrant checking for binding brake calipers or worn brake discs, especially if the vehicle was driven hard between tests. Structural corrosion should be inspected at wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, as prolonged standing or deferred maintenance could accelerate rust. Finally, verify the condition of the exhaust system for leaks or excessive corrosion, as emissions-related failures are often overlooked until they become test-day issues. The absence of defect codes does not preclude underlying wear—only thorough mechanical scrutiny will confirm the vehicle’s true condition.