DVLA verified

AUSTIN MINI DESIGNER1988 · 1.0L PETROL

F864 PWP

Vehicle Insight Summary

AUSTIN MINI DESIGNER (1988, PETROL, 998cc) — mileage recorded at 77,470. MOT status: not recorded. Road tax: not taxed. Check full history before buying.

MOT
Failed
No data
Tax
SORN
Statutory Off Road Notification
Fuel
PETROL
Year
1988
Engine
998cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently unroadworthy based on the final recorded inspection, which shows a total failure on 30 July 2010 at 77,470 miles. The data indicates a severe lack of mechanical and structural maintenance. Because there are no subsequent test records following this date, the maintenance trend cannot be classified as improving. The sheer volume of failures suggests a vehicle that suffered from significant neglect and advanced age decay rather than routine component wear. The recorded mileage of 77,470 miles is exceptionally low for a 38-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 2,039 miles per year. While low mileage often implies less wear on the engine and drivetrain, in the context of this Austin Mini, it correlates with accelerated corrosion. way periods of standing or minimal use frequently lead to the seizing of mechanical components and the degradation of rubber seals, which is consistent with the extensive failures noted in the test history. A prospective buyer must conduct a rigorous inspection of the structural integrity of the sub-frames and mounting points. The 2010 test flagged serious structural corrosion on the nearside rear sub-frame, the offside front steering artwork mounting, and the seat belt anchor points. These are safety-critical failures that indicate the metal has lost its integrity. The buyer should also examine the rear valance and windscreen lower panel for active rust, as these were already identified as weakened areas prior to the vehicle's removal. The mechanical and braking systems require a complete overhaul assessment. The record details broken brake cables, heavily corroded brake pipes, and poor efficiency across both the service and parking brakes. Furthermore, the suspension suffered from split steering rack gaiters, worn ball joints, and deteriorated CV joint gaiters. Given the failure of the bonded suspension unit, the vehicle likely requires significant investment before it could be considered safe for road use.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

30
/ 100 · Poor

Public record health check: Poor.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
! Tax Status Unknown
✗ Poor MOT pass rate (0%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 30 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for F864PWP

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

MOT data last updated: 6/4/2026, 5:16:30 AM

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently unroadworthy based on the final recorded inspection, which shows a total failure on 30 July 2010 at 77,470 miles. The data indicates a severe lack of mechanical and structural maintenance. Because there are no subsequent test records following this date, the maintenance trend cannot be classified as improving. The sheer volume of failures suggests a vehicle that suffered from significant neglect and advanced age decay rather than routine component wear. The recorded mileage of 77,470 miles is exceptionally low for a 38-year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 2,039 miles per year. While low mileage often implies less wear on the engine and drivetrain, in the context of this Austin Mini, it correlates with accelerated corrosion. way periods of standing or minimal use frequently lead to the seizing of mechanical components and the degradation of rubber seals, which is consistent with the extensive failures noted in the test history. A prospective buyer must conduct a rigorous inspection of the structural integrity of the sub-frames and mounting points. The 2010 test flagged serious structural corrosion on the nearside rear sub-frame, the offside front steering artwork mounting, and the seat belt anchor points. These are safety-critical failures that indicate the metal has lost its integrity. The buyer should also examine the rear valance and windscreen lower panel for active rust, as these were already identified as weakened areas prior to the vehicle's removal. The mechanical and braking systems require a complete overhaul assessment. The record details broken brake cables, heavily corroded brake pipes, and poor efficiency across both the service and parking brakes. Furthermore, the suspension suffered from split steering rack gaiters, worn ball joints, and deteriorated CV joint gaiters. Given the failure of the bonded suspension unit, the vehicle likely requires significant investment before it could be considered safe for road use.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Our records for this Austin Mini Designer (F864 PWP) from 1988 show a total of 1 MOT test between July 2010 and July 2010.

Historically, this vehicle has passed 0% of its MOT tests, totaling 0 passes against 1 fails. Given the frequent MOT failures, it is worth checking if major repairs have been properly addressed.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Brakes (8 issues), Suspension (4 issues), Lighting (3 issues), Steering (3 issues), Bodywork (3 issues). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There is 1 advisory notice in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 24 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)”; “Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)”; “Offside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY