IsItAGoodCar
Official DVLA Record

2003 Mazda MX-5 1.8L Petrol · FL53 AEC

FL53 AEC

2003 Mazda MX-5 (1.8L, petrol). First registered 01/11/2003. Recorded mileage 123,416 miles. MOT status: Expired.

Make & Model
MAZDA MX-5
Year / Origin
2003 · Nottingham
Safety Recall
Unknown
MOT Status
Valid until 16/06/2026
Road Tax
Untaxed (01/10/2025)
Recorded Mileage
123,416 mi
ULEZ Compliance
Likely ULEZ Compliant (Early Euro 4)
Fuel & Engine
Petrol · 1.8L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Expired
Valid until 16/06/2026
Tax Status
Untaxed
Tax due 01/10/2025
Fuel Type
Petrol
Year
2003
Engine
1839cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

A pattern of progressive front suspension wear defines the mechanical story of this MX-5, with the upper ball joints and steering linkage emerging as the principal area of concern. The 2024 test recorded a major failure for excessive play in the nearside front steering linkage ball joint and the nearside front upper suspension arm ball joint dust cover no longer preventing dirt ingress, both of which are wear items that typically deteriorate steadily once initiated. By the 2025 retest, the dust covers on both front upper arms had deteriorated to the point of recording as minor defects, while the nearside rear anti-roll bar linkage ball joint, first flagged for slight play in 2024, has continued with the same advisory in 2025, suggesting the play has remained stable rather than worsened but has not been rectified. Despite these recurring advisories, the vehicle passed its 2025-06-18 test, indicating that nothing has yet crossed the pass/fail threshold, though the trajectory of the front end components warrants close attention as they age further on a 23-year-old chassis. The recorded mileage of 123,416 miles across 23 years equates to roughly 5,366 miles per year, which is notably low for any road car and is consistent with a second-vehicle or weekend use profile rather than a daily driver. Such restrained annual accumulation tends to reduce wear on high-mileage consumables such as the clutch, gearbox synchros and engine internals, but it carries its own considerations for a car of this age, including the possibility of extended periods of standing which can accelerate corrosion on ferrous components and degrade rubber seals, boots and bushes through dry-out rather than mechanical wear. The MOT history provided shows consistent annual testing from at least 2023, with no obvious multi-year gaps that would indicate prolonged lay-up, so the advisories logged are more reflective of gradual in-use wear on the suspension than of storage-related deterioration. Even so, the relatively gentle usage means the brake disc pitting and exhaust noise noted across multiple tests have not progressed aggressively between visits. For a prospective buyer, the front suspension and steering assemblies should be the primary focus of any pre-purchase inspection. The nearside front upper ball joint dust cover and offside equivalent should be examined physically for splits, perish or complete detachment, as the 2025 advisories indicate both sides are now at the deteriorated stage and the nearside has previously been a fail item. On the test drive, listen for clonks or knocks from the front end over uneven surfaces, particularly on direction changes, which would indicate worn ball joints, anti-roll bar links or top mounts, and feel for any vagueness or looseness through the steering wheel that could point to the steering ball joint play already flagged. The tyres and rear brake discs also warrant inspection; the 2023 advisory for the offside rear tyre worn close to the legal limit suggests an alignment or camber issue that may still be present, and the recurring rear brake disc pitting and corrosion on the rear brake pipe should be checked for severity, as pitted discs can produce pedal judder under braking and corroded pipes are a known structural concern on older Mazda roadsters. Closer inspection should also be given to the exhaust system, which has been flagged as noisy at every recorded test since 2023, and to the rear brake pipe which was noted as corroded in the 2023 test. An exhaust that has remained noisy across consecutive tests without repair suggests an ongoing leak, most commonly at the manifold gasket, downpipe joint or a corroded centre or rear silencer, and a physical check from underneath while the engine is running will help locate the source. The rear brake pipe corrosion should be examined for surface rust versus actual metal loss, particularly along the underside where road salt collects, and any pipe showing flaking or thinning should be regarded as a near-term replacement item. Finally, because this generation of MX-5 is renowned for both its driving enjoyment and its vulnerability to corrosion in the rear wheel arches, sills and boot floor, a thorough walkaround with attention to these areas, combined with a careful test drive over broken surfaces to expose any suspension knocks, will give the clearest picture of whether this particular car remains a sound mechanical proposition.

FL53 AEC Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 18/06/2025
  • 123,416 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 2 historical MOT failures
  • 5 defects noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring suspension items (9 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
50
/ 100 · Below Average
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Below Average

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
! Older vehicle
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for FL53AEC

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

ULEZ Compliant

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

FL53 AEC Mileage History

  1. 24/07/2023111,755 mi
  2. 16/07/2024119,233 mi+7,478 mi
  3. 24/07/2024119,269 mi+36 mi
  4. 18/06/2025123,416 mi+4,147 mi
  5. 18/06/2025123,416 mi

Average of roughly 6,128 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

FL53 AEC MOT History

Vehicle record last updated: 28 Sept 2026, 14:56
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2003 Mazda Mx-5 (FL53 AEC) between July 2023 and June 2025.

The record contains 3 passes and 2 failures.

The most recent test on 18 June 2025 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 2 failures that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Suspension (9 issues), Lighting (7 issues), Brakes (4 issues), Exhaust & Emissions (4 issues), Tyres (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 16 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Offside Rear Inner Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced (7.1.1 (a) (i))”; “Nearside Front Steering linkage ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))”; “Offside Front Upper Suspension arm ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY