2017 Nissan Figaro 1.0L Petrol · H597 OCC

The 2017 Nissan Figaro’s most recent MOT test on 2025-12-10 passed without defects, but the immediate preceding test on 2025-12-02 failed for the same mileage—an unusual and concerning repetition given no recorded issues. This suggests either an administrative error or a test centre discrepancy, though the lack of defects in prior tests (2024-11-28, 2023-12-04) indicates no consistent mechanical failures. The vehicle’s roadworthiness status remains technically compliant, but the double-test anomaly at the same mileage warrants scrutiny of whether the vehicle was driven between tests or if the failure was procedural rather than technical. The recorded mileage of 111,201 miles over nine years equates to approximately 12,356 miles annually, which is high for a vehicle of this age. The gap between tests in 2024 (106,697 miles) and 2023 (101,884 miles) spans roughly 4,813 miles in a year, suggesting consistent use rather than prolonged neglect. However, the identical mileage for the failed and passed tests in December 2025 implies either a retest or a brief period of inactivity before the final pass. This pattern does not indicate severe neglect but does suggest the vehicle has been actively driven, which may accelerate wear on high-mileage components. Given the lack of recorded defects, the primary focus for an in-person inspection should centre on components typically affected by high mileage and repeated use. The suspension system—particularly coil springs, bushes, and dampers—should be examined for uneven wear or corrosion, as these are common failure points in vehicles of this age and mileage. Brake discs and calipers, especially rear, should be checked for excessive thickness loss or binding, though the MOT history does not indicate prior brake-related failures. Structural integrity, including underbody corrosion around wheel arches and sills, is critical given the vehicle’s age, as is the condition of the exhaust system for leaks or rust penetration. The absence of advisories in past tests does not guarantee these areas are intact, so a thorough visual and functional assessment is essential.