2001 Ford Puma 1.7L Petrol · HN51 ADV
2001 Ford Puma (1.7L, petrol). First registered 01/09/2001. Recorded mileage 75,907 miles. MOT valid until 19/07/2027. Taxed until 01/08/2027.
- Make & Model
- FORD PUMA
- Year / Origin
- 2001 · Portsmouth
- Safety Recall
- Unknown
- MOT Status
- Valid until 19/07/2027
- Road Tax
- Taxed (01/08/2027)
- Recorded Mileage
- 75,907 mi
- ULEZ Compliance
- Check Required (Pre-Euro 4 Petrol)
- Fuel & Engine
- PETROL · 1.7L
- Reliability Guide
- Common Faults
- Fuel Type
- PETROL
- Year
- 2001
- Engine
- 1679cc
HN51 ADV Key Findings
- 5 MOT tests recorded
- Latest MOT passed on 21/07/2026
- 75,907 miles recorded at latest MOT
- 1 historical MOT failure
- 3 defects noted at the latest MOT
- Recurring brakes items (4 mentions)
Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.
MOT Roadworthiness: Good
This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.
Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.
Technical Specifications
Core Specifications
Identification & Status
Dimensions & Weights
Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence
Estimate current market value
Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.
HN51 ADV Mileage History
- 08/09/202373,129 mi
- 17/09/202474,648 mi+1,519 mi
- 26/09/202474,650 mi+2 mi
- 17/09/202575,445 mi+795 mi
- 21/07/202675,907 mi+462 mi
Average of roughly 969 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.
HN51 ADV MOT History
Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.
5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2001 Ford Puma (HN51 ADV) between September 2023 and July 2026.
The record contains 4 passes and 1 failure.
The most recent test on 21 July 2026 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 1 failure that buyers may want to investigate.
Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Brakes (4 issues), Tyres (4 issues), Exhaust & Emissions (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.
In total 10 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.
Recorded failure items include: “Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))”; “Exhaust Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (8.2.1.2 (c))”.
Buyer's Guide & Inspection Advisory
Expert automotive synthesis from historical MOT defect records and market benchmarks.
Our Verdict
Caution: The Puma's history of repeated major mechanical and structural failures makes it a high‑risk purchase despite its low mileage. Proceed only after a thorough inspection and price negotiation.
Start by reviewing the full service history and confirming that all scheduled maintenance, especially for the suspension and brake systems, has been carried out. Look for evidence that the major items noted in the MOT failures — such as the near‑side rear brake pipe corrosion, the damaged front brake hose, and the worn strut pins and bushes — have been repaired or replaced with genuine parts.
During a physical inspection, focus on the suspension geometry, checking for excessive play in the strut pins, bushes and lower arm mounts, and examine the condition of the brake lines and pipes for rust or leaks. Also verify the state of the tyres, as the recent advisories show they are worn close to the legal limit, and inspect the exhaust system for signs of lambda sensor issues or pipe corrosion.
Finally, consider a professional pre‑purchase inspection to assess the extent of any hidden corrosion and to test the brake performance, and use the documented MOT failures as leverage when negotiating a discount that reflects the likely repair bill.
The 1.6 L petrol engine typically delivers around 45‑50 mpg, so with average annual mileage the fuel cost would be approximately £600‑£700. Road tax for a vehicle of this age and engine capacity is usually £150‑£200 per year, and insurance for a small petrol car of this vintage tends to sit in group 13‑15, adding roughly £300‑£400 per year.
Maintenance expenses, which include periodic tyre changes, brake pad and fluid replacement, and the likely need to address suspension and brake component wear given the vehicle’s history, are expected to be £500‑£800 per year. Combining these factors, the overall estimated annual running cost is £800‑£1,000.
Begin with a detailed visual inspection of the suspension components, paying close attention to the near‑side and off‑side front and rear strut pins, bushes and lower arm mounts, as the MOT history shows repeated major failures in these areas. Look for any signs of rust, corrosion or cracked rubber on the suspension arms and mounting points, especially the structural corrosion noted on the rear suspension mounts.
Next, examine the brake system: inspect the near‑side rear brake pipe for corrosion, check the condition of the front brake hose for cracks or damage, and verify that the brake discs and pads are not excessively worn, given the advisory notes on thin front brake pads and tyres worn close to the legal limit. Also test the handbrake and footbrake operation for grinding noises, which may indicate worn brake shoes.
Finally, assess the exhaust system for the lambda reading fault indicated in the 2024 MOT, check for any oil leaks around the engine and transmission, and confirm that the power steering pump seepage noted in the 2016 advisory is under control. Verify tyre tread depth and wear patterns, as the recent advisories show the front inner tyres are worn close to the limit.
The 2001 Ford Puma with a current odometer reading of 75,907 miles has passed the latest MOT but carries a record of multiple major failures, including corroded brake pipes, damaged suspension components and exhaust lambda faults. While the mileage is below the typical average for its age, the frequent MOT failures indicate potential neglect and upcoming repair costs. The vehicle’s running costs will be typical for a small petrol car of this era, but the likelihood of needing significant repairs soon reduces its overall value proposition.
No aggregate reliability data exists for the Ford Puma, but its 1.6 L petrol engine typically shows moderate reliability with common issues in suspension and brake components, as reflected by the vehicle's frequent major MOT failures.
Reviewed by the IsItAGoodCar editorial team — Verified automotive analysis synthesized from official vehicle registries.
Data Sources
DVSA
Official MOT test logs & failure reasons
DVLA
Tax, registration & powertrain specs
Experian
Finance, stolen markers & total loss
AI Analysis
Historical fault & advisory patterns
Similar Vehicles
Similar Vehicles Checked Recently
Plate Neighbors
Batch Registration Neighbors (HN51 Series)
Vehicles registered in the same regional DVLA batch as HN51ADV.
FERRARI
F430
LAND ROVER
RANGE ROVER EVOQUE
FORD
FIESTA
FORD
FOCUS
FORD
FIESTA
FORD
FOCUS
FORD
FORD
FIESTA
FORD
FIESTA
VOLKSWAGEN
GOLF
FORD
RANGER
FORD
RANGER