2015 Jeep Renegade 1.6L Diesel · KR65 ACO

The Jeep Renegade’s most recent MOT tests, conducted just eight months ago on 2025-09-04, reveal a concerning pattern of repeated failures despite identical mileage readings of 114,548 miles. Both tests passed and failed on the same day, with no defects recorded—an anomaly that suggests either a procedural error in the testing process or a vehicle that narrowly avoided critical failings. The preceding MOT in 2024, at 94,542 miles, similarly showed a pass and fail on the same date with no defects, indicating no meaningful progression in mechanical condition over time. While the 2022 test at 61,796 miles passed without issue, the lack of defects in later tests does not necessarily imply stability; rather, it raises suspicion that the tester may have overlooked serious underlying issues, particularly given the vehicle’s age and mileage. The recorded mileage progression of approximately 10,400 miles annually is typical for a vehicle of this age, though the gaps between tests—particularly the 18-month interval between 2024 and 2025—are unusually long for a car approaching its sixth year. The identical mileage readings at consecutive MOTs (114,548 miles in 2025 and 94,542 in 2024) suggest either tampering with the odometer or inconsistent recording, neither of which bodes well for transparency. The absence of advisories or defects in earlier tests does not mitigate the risk; rather, it implies that the vehicle may have slipped through tests with only cosmetic or minor issues addressed, while more critical components—such as suspension mounts, drivetrain seals, or structural corrosion—were not properly assessed. Given the repeated MOT failures without recorded defects, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension system, particularly the subframe mounts, coil springs, and bushings, which are common failure points in this model at this mileage. The brakes, despite no recorded failures, warrant scrutiny for uneven wear, binding calipers, or corrosion on the rear discs, as the tester’s oversight in 2025 could indicate a broader neglect of mechanical integrity. Structural integrity is another critical concern; the absence of corrosion advisories in past tests does not guarantee its absence, so a thorough examination of wheel arches, sills, and underbody panels is essential. Finally, the drivetrain—including the transfer case, differentials, and CV joints—should be checked for leaks or excessive play, as these components often fail silently before becoming MOT-critical. The repeated test anomalies strongly suggest that the vehicle has not undergone consistent, professional maintenance, and any buyer should proceed with caution.