2016 Ford Grand C-MAX 1.5L Diesel · LO66 ABU

The most recent MOT history for this 2016 Ford Grand C-Max demonstrates a stable but inconsistent maintenance pattern, with the vehicle failing twice in quick succession before passing in June 2025. The June 2025 retest at 76,185 miles—just six days after the initial failure—indicates a deliberate attempt to rectify issues before the test window expired. That the vehicle passed without recorded defects suggests either a swift, corrective overhaul or a minor oversight in the initial inspection. The lack of advisories or recurring faults in any test implies no chronic mechanical failures, though the repeated failures at the same mileage (65,265 vs. 65,266) hint at a potential oversight in pre-test preparation rather than a persistent defect. The mileage progression reveals a steady but unremarkable usage pattern for its age, averaging approximately 7,600 miles annually. There are no prolonged gaps in service, nor is there evidence of aggressive driving—mileage increased by roughly 10,900 miles between August 2023 and June 2024, a rate consistent with typical British driving habits. The absence of intermediate MOTs or service records means no direct insight into maintenance intervals, but the lack of failures beyond the retest period suggests the vehicle was either well-maintained or that any issues were addressed promptly. The most notable anomaly is the back-to-back failures in 2024 and 2025, which could imply either a test centre procedural quirk or a minor, easily fixable oversight rather than a mechanical trend. Given the lack of recorded defects, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of high-wear components that aren’t captured in MOT tests. The repeated failures at the same mileage—despite no defects being logged—raise cautious curiosity about the brakes, suspension, or exhaust emissions systems, as these are common causes of MOT failures. Check for uneven tyre wear, which could indicate alignment or suspension issues, and inspect coil springs, bushes, and shock absorbers for deterioration or leaks. Binding brake calipers or warped discs are also likely culprits if the tester missed them initially. Structural corrosion, particularly around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, should be examined closely, as this is a critical but often overlooked failure mode in older vehicles. Finally, verify the integrity of the exhaust system, especially around joints and catalytic converter mounts, as emissions-related failures are frequently overlooked until they manifest as test failures.