2010 Ford Mondeo 1.8L Diesel · LT60 AEB

The 2010 Ford Mondeo’s most recent MOT test on 2022-01-10—conducted at exactly 166,981 miles—shows a critical inconsistency: the vehicle was both passed and failed on the same date with no recorded defects. This suggests either an administrative error in the DVSA system or a test where no faults were found despite the duplicate entry. Without intervening tests since then, there is no definitive evidence of a worsening or improving trend in roadworthiness. The absence of advisories or repeated failures in the available record implies no obvious pattern of neglect, but the lack of recent testing—nearly four years ago—means critical components may have deteriorated beyond observable limits. Buyers should treat this as a red flag for potential unreported issues, particularly given the vehicle’s age and mileage. The recorded mileage of 166,981 miles over approximately 16 years equates to an average of around 10,436 miles annually, which is typical for a car of this age. There are no intermediate MOT records to confirm consistent usage, but the lack of rapid mileage spikes or prolonged stagnation suggests the vehicle was driven regularly rather than left unused for extended periods. However, the absence of any MOT tests between 2022 and the present—nearly four years—means there is no verification of maintenance or repairs during this period. This gap alone raises questions about whether routine services, such as brake fluid changes, suspension inspections, or corrosion checks, were performed. Given the sparse MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of high-wear areas. The suspension—particularly coil springs, bushes, and dampers—will likely show signs of fatigue at this mileage, with potential for uneven tyre wear or a stiff ride. Brakes, though not flagged in the record, may require scrutiny for uneven pad thickness, warped discs, or binding calipers, especially if the vehicle was driven hard. Structural integrity is another concern; corrosion in wheel arches, sills, or the subframe could compromise safety, and the exhaust system may exhibit leaks or broken hangers. The lack of recent testing means these areas could have deteriorated significantly without documentation.