DVLA verified

MITSUBISHI FTO1995 · 1.8L PETROL

M698 GGP

Vehicle Insight Summary

This 1995 MITSUBISHI FTO is a PETROL vehicle with a 1800cc engine. Currently it has no valid MOT recorded and is not currently taxed. The latest recorded mileage is 189,946.

MOT
Expired
Expires 09/12/2014
Tax
Untaxed
Expires 01/02/2014
Fuel
PETROL
Year
1995
Engine
1800cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The roadworthiness of this vehicle is highly uncertain due to a complete lack of MOT data for the past thirteen years. The last recorded test occurred in December 2013 at 189,946 miles, where the vehicle passed after addressing several failures. Because no tests have been performed since that date, there is no documented evidence to verify the current structural integrity or mechanical safety of the car. The maintenance trend has effectively stalled, suggesting the vehicle has either sat in storage or been operated without official safety inspections for over a decade. The vehicle has covered 189,946 miles over 31 years, averaging approximately 6,127 miles per year. While this figure is consistent with typical usage for its age, the data stops abruptly between October 2012 and December 2013, where only 14,482 miles were recorded in a short window. The subsequent thirteen-year gap in the MOT history is a significant red flag, as the natural degradation of rubber components, seals, and fluid systems occurs over time regardless of the actual mileage driven. A physical inspection must focus heavily on the structural condition of the chassis and suspension points. The history shows a persistent and worsening trend of corrosion in the rear suspension mounting areas and the front subframe, which progressed from minor corrosion in 2012 to excessive corrosion causing a failure in late 2013. A buyer must check for deep-seated rust or perforation in these specific areas, as well as the condition of the rear brake pipes. The anti-roll bar linkages and bushes also require scrutiny for play, as these were repeatedly identified as points of failure in the final recorded tests.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

50
/ 100 · Below Average

Public record health check: Below Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 50 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for M698GGP

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

MOT data last updated: 6/4/2026, 3:37:01 PM

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The roadworthiness of this vehicle is highly uncertain due to a complete lack of MOT data for the past thirteen years. The last recorded test occurred in December 2013 at 189,946 miles, where the vehicle passed after addressing several failures. Because no tests have been performed since that date, there is no documented evidence to verify the current structural integrity or mechanical safety of the car. The maintenance trend has effectively stalled, suggesting the vehicle has either sat in storage or been operated without official safety inspections for over a decade. The vehicle has covered 189,946 miles over 31 years, averaging approximately 6,127 miles per year. While this figure is consistent with typical usage for its age, the data stops abruptly between October 2012 and December 2013, where only 14,482 miles were recorded in a short window. The subsequent thirteen-year gap in the MOT history is a significant red flag, as the natural degradation of rubber components, seals, and fluid systems occurs over time regardless of the actual mileage driven. A physical inspection must focus heavily on the structural condition of the chassis and suspension points. The history shows a persistent and worsening trend of corrosion in the rear suspension mounting areas and the front subframe, which progressed from minor corrosion in 2012 to excessive corrosion causing a failure in late 2013. A buyer must check for deep-seated rust or perforation in these specific areas, as well as the condition of the rear brake pipes. The anti-roll bar linkages and bushes also require scrutiny for play, as these were repeatedly identified as points of failure in the final recorded tests.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Our records for this Mitsubishi Fto (M698 GGP) from 1995 show a total of 5 MOT tests between November 2011 and December 2013.

Historically, this vehicle has passed 60% of its MOT tests, totaling 3 passes against 2 fails. While not perfect, the history shows a relatively typical pattern of MOT passes and fails.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Suspension (8 issues), Lighting (6 issues), Exhaust & Emissions (2 issues), Brakes (2 issues), Tyres (2 issues). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 17 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 8 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Offside Front Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)”; “Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)”; “Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY