2015 Ford Kuga 2.0L Diesel · MT65 AEF

The 2015 Ford Kuga’s most recent MOT test, conducted on 4 March 2026 at 94,346 miles, confirms the vehicle passed without defects, though it follows an unusually close failure just nine days prior at 94,151 miles. This abrupt retest suggests either a rushed last-minute correction or a minor oversight in pre-MOT preparation, as no defects were recorded in either instance. The preceding tests—all clean passes at roughly annual intervals—indicate no recurring mechanical failures, but the lack of advisories or minor issues in any record raises suspicion about whether basic wear items (tyres, brakes, suspension) were addressed between tests. The vehicle’s roadworthiness is technically current, but the absence of any recorded advisories or defects across five tests implies either meticulous maintenance or a tendency to overlook pre-MOT servicing. Mileage progression shows a steady but unremarkable accumulation, averaging around 8,500 miles per year—a typical rate for a vehicle of this age. The gap between the 2025 and 2026 tests spans exactly 12 months, with no unusual spikes or prolonged inactivity, suggesting consistent use without extreme wear patterns. The most notable anomaly is the 2026 retest, where the vehicle failed then passed within a week, covering just 195 miles between tests—a pattern unlikely to reflect genuine mechanical deterioration. This could imply either a test centre error or a deliberate attempt to pass without addressing underlying wear, particularly in areas like brake linings or suspension condition. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of high-wear components not routinely checked in basic MOTs. Focus on the rear brakes, which were flagged in the 2026 failure (though no specifics are recorded), as binding or uneven wear could indicate long-term neglect. Examine the suspension bushes and coil springs for cracking or excessive play, especially around the rear axle, where wear tends to accelerate beyond 100,000 miles. Tyre tread depth and lateral wear should be verified, as the absence of advisories in prior tests suggests they may not have been serviced between MOTs. Structural corrosion, particularly around wheel arches and sills, should also be inspected, as this model is prone to rust progression in wet conditions. The engine bay and exhaust system warrant scrutiny for leaks or excessive corrosion, given the vehicle’s age and mileage.