2013 Nissan Juke 1.6L Petrol · NC13 ABO

The 2013 Nissan Juke presents a mechanically stable profile based on its most recent MOT on 2025-11-06 at 83,598 miles, which recorded a pass with no defects. However, the preceding test on 2025-11-05 at the same mileage resulted in a fail, though no specific defects were noted. This inconsistency suggests potential testing variability or procedural errors, as no faults were logged in either outcome. The vehicle’s maintenance history shows no recurring mechanical issues, with prior tests from 2024-11-15 (pass) and 2024-11-13 (fail) also reporting no defects. The absence of recorded faults across multiple tests implies the car has not exhibited critical mechanical or structural failures, though the lack of detailed defect data limits definitive conclusions. Mileage progression aligns with typical usage for a 13-year-old vehicle, averaging 6,431 miles annually. The 2024-01-09 test at 67,773 miles marked the earliest recorded data, followed by a 4,000-mile increase to 71,761 by 2024-11-13. A subsequent 11,837-mile jump to 83,598 by 2025-11-06 reflects a higher-than-average annual rate, potentially indicating extended periods of use or longer journeys. No significant gaps in testing are evident, as MOTs were conducted roughly annually. The clean defect history, despite the recent fail, suggests the vehicle has not encountered major mechanical or safety risks, though the lack of detailed records prevents a thorough assessment of underlying conditions. A buyer should prioritise inspecting the suspension system for worn bushes or coil springs, common issues in older Jukes, and check for corrosion in the exhaust system, which can degrade over time. The absence of brake-related defects does not preclude a physical inspection of brake discs, calipers, and pads for uneven wear or binding. Additionally, verifying the structural integrity of the chassis and body panels for rust or damage is advisable, as these issues may not surface in MOT tests. While the vehicle’s MOT history indicates no critical failures, the lack of detailed defect data necessitates a hands-on evaluation to confirm its overall condition.