DVLA verified
MOT valid
Tax valid

2010 RENAULT TRUCKS MASTER2.5L DIESEL

PO60 EEZ

Vehicle Insight Summary

RENAULT TRUCKS MASTER (2010, DIESEL, 2464cc) — mileage recorded at 198,344. MOT status: valid. Road tax: paid. Check full history before buying.

MOT
Valid
Expires 13/05/2027
Tax
Taxed
Expires 01/11/2026
Powered by Experian Data
£8.99
Check outstanding finance, stolen records, write-off categories & mileage anomalies.
Instant results • £20,000 data guarantee • Same data source as HPI
Fuel
DIESEL
Year
2010
Engine
2464cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The most recent MOT, conducted on 8 May 2026 at 198,344 miles, shows a pass, but the maintenance picture is mixed. Two weeks prior, on 6 May 2026, the vehicle failed with a corroded offside rear brake pipe and a severely deteriorated nearside front constant velocity boot. Both defects were rectified before the retest, yet their presence at such high mileage suggests ongoing wear rather than a one-off lapse. The trend is broadly stable, with recurring minor faults rather than a clear downward spiral, but the pattern of advisories and failures points to a vehicle that has been kept running rather than meticulously maintained. At roughly 12,396 miles per year, this 2010 Master has covered a high mileage for its age, consistent with sustained commercial or heavy-use operation. The record shows a gap of nearly a year between the May 2024 pass at 190,746 miles and the May 2026 failure at 198,268 miles, during which around 7,500 miles were added. No MOT entries appear for 2025 beyond the April advisory pass at 194,057 miles, leaving a period with no documented test. This could reflect a gap in testing, a period of limited use, or simply missing data, but the overall mileage accumulation is steady and high. A buyer should focus on the structural and mechanical components that have repeatedly drawn attention. The offside rear brake pipe corrosion flagged in May 2026, noted as covered in grease or other material, raises questions about the condition of the remaining brake lines and the extent of underbody corrosion. The nearside front constant velocity boot has been flagged twice in close succession, indicating a joint that may be exposed to dirt ingress and premature wear. Suspension wear is also evident: the May 2024 test identified worn rear anti-roll bar bushes and slight play in the offside rear lower suspension arm ball joint, while the 2024 failure recorded a loose central engine mounting bracket. These items suggest the chassis and drivetrain have absorbed significant stress. Beyond the documented faults, a physical inspection should cover the underframe for corrosion, particularly around brake lines, suspension mounting points, and subframes. The engine and gearbox mountings, driveshaft joints, and all constant velocity boots deserve close scrutiny given the repeated advisories. Tyre wear patterns and brake disc and pad condition should be checked, as high-mileage commercial use often accelerates consumable wear. The windscreen damage noted in April 2025, while not affecting the driver's view at the time, should be re-examined for any progression that could compromise structural integrity or future test outcomes.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

65
/ 100 · Average

Public record health check: Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
! Average MOT pass rate (60%)
✗ 1 dangerous defects found recently
A score of 65 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for PO60EEZ

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked
Powered by Experian Data

Premium Vehicle History Data Locked

Unlock the full report to reveal outstanding finance agreements, police stolen markers, insurance write-off categories (Cat A/B/C/D/S/N), mileage anomaly checks, and plate changes.

Instant results • £20,000 data guarantee • Same data source as HPI

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 4 Jun 2026, 16:57
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The most recent MOT, conducted on 8 May 2026 at 198,344 miles, shows a pass, but the maintenance picture is mixed. Two weeks prior, on 6 May 2026, the vehicle failed with a corroded offside rear brake pipe and a severely deteriorated nearside front constant velocity boot. Both defects were rectified before the retest, yet their presence at such high mileage suggests ongoing wear rather than a one-off lapse. The trend is broadly stable, with recurring minor faults rather than a clear downward spiral, but the pattern of advisories and failures points to a vehicle that has been kept running rather than meticulously maintained. At roughly 12,396 miles per year, this 2010 Master has covered a high mileage for its age, consistent with sustained commercial or heavy-use operation. The record shows a gap of nearly a year between the May 2024 pass at 190,746 miles and the May 2026 failure at 198,268 miles, during which around 7,500 miles were added. No MOT entries appear for 2025 beyond the April advisory pass at 194,057 miles, leaving a period with no documented test. This could reflect a gap in testing, a period of limited use, or simply missing data, but the overall mileage accumulation is steady and high. A buyer should focus on the structural and mechanical components that have repeatedly drawn attention. The offside rear brake pipe corrosion flagged in May 2026, noted as covered in grease or other material, raises questions about the condition of the remaining brake lines and the extent of underbody corrosion. The nearside front constant velocity boot has been flagged twice in close succession, indicating a joint that may be exposed to dirt ingress and premature wear. Suspension wear is also evident: the May 2024 test identified worn rear anti-roll bar bushes and slight play in the offside rear lower suspension arm ball joint, while the 2024 failure recorded a loose central engine mounting bracket. These items suggest the chassis and drivetrain have absorbed significant stress. Beyond the documented faults, a physical inspection should cover the underframe for corrosion, particularly around brake lines, suspension mounting points, and subframes. The engine and gearbox mountings, driveshaft joints, and all constant velocity boots deserve close scrutiny given the repeated advisories. Tyre wear patterns and brake disc and pad condition should be checked, as high-mileage commercial use often accelerates consumable wear. The windscreen damage noted in April 2025, while not affecting the driver's view at the time, should be re-examined for any progression that could compromise structural integrity or future test outcomes.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Our records for this Renault Trucks Master (PO60 EEZ) from 2010 show a total of 5 MOT tests between May 2024 and May 2026.

Historically, this vehicle has passed 60% of its MOT tests, totaling 3 passes against 2 fails. While not perfect, the history shows a relatively typical pattern of MOT passes and fails.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Lighting (2 issues), Tyres (2 issues), Suspension (2 issues), Brakes (2 issues), Steering (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 9 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 6 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Rear Stop lamp(s) all not working (4.3.1 (a) (iii))”; “Offside Front Fuel cap/sealing device ineffective (6.1.3 (b) (i))”; “Front Registration plate inscription illegible (0.1 (b))”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY