2006 Volvo XC90 2.4L Diesel · RV56 AFA

The most recent MOT test on 2025-05-17 confirms the vehicle passed without defects, though it follows an unusual pattern of back-to-back failures and passes in consecutive years. The 2025-05-15 failure—just two days before the pass—stands out as anomalous, given no defects were recorded on either test. This inconsistency suggests either a rare administrative oversight or a transient issue resolved between tests. The 2024 cycle mirrors this pattern, with a failure on 2024-05-13 and a pass on 2024-05-15, again with no recorded faults. While the vehicle ultimately meets current roadworthiness standards, the repeated failures without explanations warrant scrutiny of whether underlying issues were overlooked or whether the tester’s criteria varied. The trend does not indicate worsening or improving maintenance—only a lack of transparency in the recorded data. The recorded mileage of 176,923 miles at the 2025-05-17 test reflects a steady average of approximately 8,846 miles per year over the vehicle’s lifespan, which aligns with typical usage for its age. There are no significant gaps or spikes in mileage between tests, suggesting consistent driving patterns without prolonged periods of disuse or rapid wear. The 2023-05-12 to 2024-05-15 interval covers 12,396 miles in just over a year, and the 2024-05-15 to 2025-05-17 span accounts for another 9,614 miles, reinforcing a predictable accumulation rate. While this does not imply exceptional wear, it does mean consumable components like brakes, tyres, and suspension parts have endured significant use and may now require closer inspection. Given the lack of specific defect details in the MOT history, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of high-wear areas common to this mileage and age. Focus on the suspension system—particularly the condition of coil springs, bushes, and shock absorbers—for signs of fatigue or corrosion, as these components degrade progressively over time. The braking system demands attention, especially rear calipers and discs, which may exhibit binding or uneven wear if the vehicle was driven with inconsistent braking habits. Structural integrity should also be assessed, particularly around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, where rust or corrosion could compromise safety. Given the repeated failures without recorded faults, verifying the integrity of the vehicle’s electrical systems—such as brake light switches, ABS sensors, or emission controls—would provide further clarity on any potential hidden issues.