2016 Ford Grand C-MAX 1.5L Diesel · SG16 AAM

This 2016 Ford Grand C-Max has maintained a consistently clean MOT history across five consecutive tests, with no defects or advisories recorded since its last inspection on January 12, 2026. The vehicle’s roadworthiness status remains stable, with no evidence of recurring mechanical failures or progressive deterioration in critical systems. The most recent test confirms compliance with current UK regulations, though the absence of advisories does not preclude underlying wear—particularly in high-mileage components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or brake calipers—which may now require closer scrutiny. The lack of any advisory notes suggests either diligent maintenance or deferred attention to minor issues, but the buyer should verify whether routine services (e.g., brake fluid changes, timing belt inspections) were performed on schedule. The recorded mileage of 80,350 miles over ten years reflects an average of approximately 8,000 miles annually, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. There are no significant gaps or abrupt jumps in mileage between tests, indicating consistent usage without prolonged periods of neglect or rapid wear. The most recent 9,111 miles since the January 2026 test align with standard annual mileage, though the buyer should confirm whether the vehicle was stored or driven under varied conditions during this period. The absence of mileage discrepancies also implies that odometer integrity appears intact, though a physical inspection of the VIN and mileage sticker would further validate this. Given the clean MOT record, the primary focus for an in-person inspection should centre on components prone to wear at this mileage: the suspension system, particularly rear bushes and coil springs, for excessive play or corrosion; brake discs and calipers for uneven wear or binding, which could indicate past neglect; and the exhaust system for signs of rust or leaks, especially around flanges. The absence of advisories does not rule out corrosion in wheel arches or subframe areas, so structural integrity should be checked for pitting or weakened sections. Additionally, the tyre tread depth and condition warrant verification, as the record does not account for intermediate replacements—worn tyres could pose a hidden risk despite passing MOT tests. A service history, if available, would clarify whether critical fluids (e.g., power steering, differential) have been changed, as these are not MOT-checked but critical to long-term reliability.