2013 Audi Q5 2.0L Diesel · T23 NBM

This 2013 Audi Q5 has maintained a consistent roadworthiness record over the last four MOT cycles, with no defects or advisories recorded in any of the tests conducted between March 2022 and June 2025. The most recent inspection on 23 June 2025—just over a year ago—confirmed the vehicle passed without issue, suggesting the current owner has adhered to the annual testing requirement. While this absence of failures indicates no obvious recurring mechanical issues, the lack of advisories also means no warnings were issued for components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or binding calipers that might require proactive replacement before they fail. The vehicle’s structural integrity and major systems appear to have been assessed as compliant at each test, but the clean record does not preclude hidden wear on high-mileage components such as brake discs, exhaust systems, or drivetrain seals. The recorded mileage of 125,215 miles over approximately 13 years equates to an average of around 9,600 miles annually, which is typical for a vehicle of this age and model. There are no significant gaps or abrupt spikes in the mileage progression visible in the MOT history, though the data only spans four tests and does not account for potential private or commercial use outside of these intervals. The most notable observation is the consistent mileage accumulation without abrupt jumps, which might suggest steady usage rather than periods of neglect or heavy duty. However, without pre-MOT records or service history, it is impossible to determine whether critical maintenance—such as brake fluid changes, timing belt inspections, or suspension servicing—has been conducted at the manufacturer-recommended intervals. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of consumable components that are not covered by the test but are critical at this mileage. The brakes, in particular, warrant close examination: while the MOT does not detail disc or pad thickness, 125,000 miles is well beyond the typical lifespan of brake linings, and uneven wear or glazing could indicate binding calipers or warped discs. The suspension should be assessed for worn or leaking bushes, particularly at the rear where Audi models are prone to bush failure, as well as for coil spring integrity and excessive play in the steering rack. The exhaust system should be checked for corrosion, especially at the mid-section and rear mounts, where leaks or sagging could indicate structural fatigue. Finally, the underbody should be inspected for signs of rust penetration around the wheel arches, sills, and subframe, as this is a common failure point on Audi models of this era.