DVLA verified
MOT valid
Tax valid
Check service history

2020 FORD KUGA ST-LINE FIRST ED E-BLUE1.5L DIESEL

T3 BLN

Vehicle Insight Summary

FORD KUGA ST-LINE FIRST ED E-BLUE (2020, DIESEL, 1499cc) — mileage recorded at 31,146. MOT status: valid. Road tax: paid. Check full history before buying.

MOT
Valid
Expires 25/09/2026
Tax
Taxed
Expires 01/11/2026
Powered by Experian Data
£8.99
Check outstanding finance, stolen records, write-off categories & mileage anomalies.
Instant results • £20,000 data guarantee • Same data source as HPI
Fuel
DIESEL
Year
2020
Engine
1499cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy but the recent MOT history indicates a trend of deferred wear-related maintenance. While it passed its latest test in September 2025 at 31,146 miles, this followed a failure just five days prior. The failure highlighted significant issues with the rear braking system, specifically thin pads and pitted discs on both rear sides. The immediate rectification of these faults suggests the owner addressed mechanical concerns only once they reached a legal failure threshold rather than following a proactive preventative schedule. At 31,146 miles over six years, the Kuga has clocked a low average of approximately 5,200 miles per year. This low usage often correlates with the corrosion and pitting observed on the brake discs during the 2024 and 2025 tests, as vehicles that sit for long periods are prone to surface rust on metal components. The gap of 7,559 miles between the 2023 and 2024 tests is consistent with this low-mileage pattern, though it accelerated the degradation of the braking hardware. A buyer must personally inspect the suspension components, as the light oil misting on both rear shock absorbers noted in September 2025 indicates early seal failure. While misting is not an immediate failure, it often precedes a total leak. Furthermore, the offside front brake pads were flagged as wearing thin in the most recent test, so the buyer should verify that these were replaced alongside the rear components. The recurring mention of pitted disc surfaces across multiple years suggests the braking system is susceptible to environmental corrosion due to the low-frequency usage.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

82
/ 100 · Good

Public record health check: Good.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
✓ Good MOT pass rate (75%)
✗ 1 dangerous defects found recently
A score of 82 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for T3BLN

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked
Powered by Experian Data

Premium Vehicle History Data Locked

Unlock the full report to reveal outstanding finance agreements, police stolen markers, insurance write-off categories (Cat A/B/C/D/S/N), mileage anomaly checks, and plate changes.

Instant results • £20,000 data guarantee • Same data source as HPI

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

May be subject to ULEZ charges
Euro EURO 6 DG

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 23 Jun 2026, 14:19
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle is currently roadworthy but the recent MOT history indicates a trend of deferred wear-related maintenance. While it passed its latest test in September 2025 at 31,146 miles, this followed a failure just five days prior. The failure highlighted significant issues with the rear braking system, specifically thin pads and pitted discs on both rear sides. The immediate rectification of these faults suggests the owner addressed mechanical concerns only once they reached a legal failure threshold rather than following a proactive preventative schedule. At 31,146 miles over six years, the Kuga has clocked a low average of approximately 5,200 miles per year. This low usage often correlates with the corrosion and pitting observed on the brake discs during the 2024 and 2025 tests, as vehicles that sit for long periods are prone to surface rust on metal components. The gap of 7,559 miles between the 2023 and 2024 tests is consistent with this low-mileage pattern, though it accelerated the degradation of the braking hardware. A buyer must personally inspect the suspension components, as the light oil misting on both rear shock absorbers noted in September 2025 indicates early seal failure. While misting is not an immediate failure, it often precedes a total leak. Furthermore, the offside front brake pads were flagged as wearing thin in the most recent test, so the buyer should verify that these were replaced alongside the rear components. The recurring mention of pitted disc surfaces across multiple years suggests the braking system is susceptible to environmental corrosion due to the low-frequency usage.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

This 2020 Ford Kuga St-Line First Ed E-Blue (T3 BLN) has a recorded MOT history spanning from September 2023 to September 2025, with 4 MOT tests on record.

The vehicle has achieved an overall 75% pass rate, with 3 passes and 1 failure recorded. This is an average MOT record. Some attention to recurring issues may be beneficial.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Brakes (7 issues), Suspension (4 issues). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 12 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 1 failure item has been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii))”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY