DVLA verified

RENAULT CLIO1999 · 1.4L PETROL

V894 FSL

Vehicle Insight Summary

This 1999 RENAULT CLIO is a PETROL vehicle with a 1390cc engine. Currently it has no valid MOT recorded and is not currently taxed. The latest recorded mileage is 82,324.

MOT
Expired
Expires 25/02/2013
Tax
Untaxed
Expires 01/04/2013
Fuel
PETROL
Year
1999
Engine
1390cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents a stable roadworthiness profile based on its final recorded test, though the data is now critically outdated. The most recent MOT conducted in February 2012 at 82,324 miles passed with no recorded defects, indicating the car was in good mechanical condition at that time. However, because there have been no tests recorded for fourteen years, the current roadworthiness status cannot be verified through official records, and the lack of recent data suggests the vehicle may have been stationary or used off-road since. The mileage pattern is exceptionally low for a twenty-seven year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 3,049 miles per year. The record shows a progression from 48,654 miles in 2009 to 82,324 miles in early 2012. While low mileage generally reduces wear on the drivetrain and engine, it significantly increases the risk of component degradation due to age, such as perished rubber seals and internal fluid corrosion. The fourteen-year gap between the February 2012 test and today is a major red flag, as the vehicle has likely sat for extended periods without professional safety testing. A buyer must prioritize a thorough inspection of the suspension and braking systems due to historical weaknesses. The February 2010 failure revealed a fractured offside coil spring, an exhaust leak, and uneven rear brake application, alongside deteriorated trailing arm bushes. While these were reportedly rectified to achieve the 2012 pass, rubber-based components in the suspension are prone to dry rot and cracking over a decade of inactivity. The inspector should specifically check for seized brake calipers, perished brake lines, and structural rust in the sills and wheel pans, which are common failure points for this era of Renault regardless of low mileage.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

60
/ 100 · Average

Public record health check: Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 60 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for V894FSL

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The vehicle presents a stable roadworthiness profile based on its final recorded test, though the data is now critically outdated. The most recent MOT conducted in February 2012 at 82,324 miles passed with no recorded defects, indicating the car was in good mechanical condition at that time. However, because there have been no tests recorded for fourteen years, the current roadworthiness status cannot be verified through official records, and the lack of recent data suggests the vehicle may have been stationary or used off-road since. The mileage pattern is exceptionally low for a twenty-seven year-old vehicle, averaging approximately 3,049 miles per year. The record shows a progression from 48,654 miles in 2009 to 82,324 miles in early 2012. While low mileage generally reduces wear on the drivetrain and engine, it significantly increases the risk of component degradation due to age, such as perished rubber seals and internal fluid corrosion. The fourteen-year gap between the February 2012 test and today is a major red flag, as the vehicle has likely sat for extended periods without professional safety testing. A buyer must prioritize a thorough inspection of the suspension and braking systems due to historical weaknesses. The February 2010 failure revealed a fractured offside coil spring, an exhaust leak, and uneven rear brake application, alongside deteriorated trailing arm bushes. While these were reportedly rectified to achieve the 2012 pass, rubber-based components in the suspension are prone to dry rot and cracking over a decade of inactivity. The inspector should specifically check for seized brake calipers, perished brake lines, and structural rust in the sills and wheel pans, which are common failure points for this era of Renault regardless of low mileage.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

This 1999 Renault Clio (V894 FSL) has a recorded MOT history spanning from February 2009 to February 2012, with 5 MOT tests on record.

With 4 passes and 1 failures, the lifetime MOT pass rate stands at 80%. The car boasts an impressive record, which typically reflects a conscientious ownership history.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Exhaust & Emissions (3 issues), Brakes (2 issues), Suspension (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 8 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 4 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Offside coil spring fractured (2.4.C.1a)”; “Exhaust emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (7.3.D.3)”; “Offside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY