Official DVLA Record
MOT Valid
Road Tax Paid

2000 Nissan Almera 1.5L Petrol · W564 AUM

W564 AUM

2000 Nissan Almera (1.5L, petrol). First registered 01/07/2000. Recorded mileage 67,218 miles. MOT valid until 26/07/2027. Taxed until 01/01/2027.

Make & Model
NISSAN ALMERA
Year / Origin
2000 · Exeter
MOT Status
Valid until 26/07/2027
Road Tax
Taxed (01/01/2027)
Recorded Mileage
67,218 mi
ULEZ Compliance
Check Required (Pre-Euro 4 Petrol)
Fuel & Engine
PETROL · 1.5L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Valid
Valid until 26/07/2027
Tax Status
Taxed
Tax due 01/01/2027
Fuel Type
PETROL
Year
2000
Engine
1497cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

This 2000 Nissan Almera presents a deeply concerning corrosion profile that has now escalated into structural failure territory, making it a high-risk prospect despite its recent pass on 28 July 2026. The most telling pattern is the persistence of underbody and brake pipe corrosion advisories across every recorded test, culminating in two serious Major failures in June 2025 for excessive corrosion within 30cm of structural mounting points on both the nearside front chassis and offside rear body. Although the vehicle returned to roadworthy status on its latest attempt, the underlying rust has not been remedied, only the immediate structural failure points were addressed, and the advisories for corroded brake pipes, corroded suspension components, and general underbody oxidation remain live. Combined with consistent front brake disc pitting and recurring brake pad wear advisories, the trajectory is one of progressive mechanical deterioration rather than stability, and the corrosion is now systemic rather than localised. The recorded mileage of 67,218 miles across 26 years equates to roughly 2,585 miles annually, which is notably low for a vehicle of this vintage and raises questions about long periods of inactivity interspersed with short bursts of use. Such low annual accumulation typically means fewer miles covered between MOTs but does not necessarily translate to a well-preserved car; standing time encourages moisture retention in brake lines, oxidation of suspension linkages, dry rot of rubber boots and bushes, and battery undercharging, all of which align closely with the advisories observed. The relatively tight clustering of tests in mid-2025 and mid-2026, with multiple attempts within weeks of each other, suggests a vehicle that has been brought back into active use and pushed through testing repeatedly rather than one maintained continuously to a high standard. The mileage itself is not the primary concern, but the pattern of sporadic use against a backdrop of advancing corrosion points to a car that has weathered rather than been driven. For any prospective buyer, the priority on inspection must be a thorough physical examination of the underbody, ideally on a ramp, paying close attention to the areas previously flagged within 30cm of cab and body mountings where the Majors were recorded. The brake lines should be inspected along their full length for surface rust, pitting, and any flaking that could indicate wall thinning, particularly given the persistent advisories covering them in grease or material, which itself masks the true extent of corrosion. Front brake discs should be checked for lipping, runout, and scored surfaces that would manifest as steering wheel vibration or pedal pulsation under braking, while suspension components including bushes, coil springs, and link arms warrant visual inspection for cracking, perishing, and movement that would produce knocking or clonking over uneven surfaces. A test drive should focus on whether the car pulls under braking, whether there is any sponginess or excessive travel in the brake pedal, and whether the steering feels vague or clonks over bumps, as these would indicate the corrosion has progressed beyond what the MOT advisories alone can reveal. Given that the most recent pass was achieved just weeks after two failed attempts, and with active corrosion advisories still outstanding on brake pipes, suspension, and the entire underbody, this Almera should be regarded as a candidate requiring immediate remedial expenditure before it can be considered reliably roadworthy. Prospective buyers should obtain a written quote for brake pipe replacement, suspension component refurbishment, and a full underbody corrosion treatment before committing to purchase, as the cost of addressing these items collectively on a 26-year-old vehicle frequently exceeds its market value. The presence of structural Majors in the recent history, even though subsequently cleared, will also impact insurance classification and future resale, and the vehicle will continue to attract corrosion advisories at each annual test until properly treated. In its current state, this is a car best suited to an enthusiast prepared to invest in restoration rather than a buyer seeking straightforward, low-cost motoring.

W564 AUM Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 28/07/2026
  • 67,218 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 3 historical MOT failures
  • 5 defects noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring brakes items (16 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

Updating live data
MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
55
/ 100 · Below Average
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Below Average

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
✗ Poor MOT pass rate (40%)
✗ 3 dangerous defects found recently
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for W564AUM

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

May be subject to ULEZ charges

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

W564 AUM Mileage History

  1. 14/06/202565,871 mi
  2. 20/06/202565,882 mi+11 mi
  3. 29/06/202667,180 mi+1,298 mi
  4. 08/07/202667,198 mi+18 mi
  5. 28/07/202667,218 mi+20 mi

Average of roughly 1,203 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

W564 AUM MOT History

Vehicle record last updated: 30 Aug 2026, 13:57
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2000 Nissan Almera (W564 AUM) between June 2025 and July 2026.

The record contains 2 passes and 3 failures.

The most recent test on 28 July 2026 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 3 failures that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Brakes (16 issues), Bodywork (6 issues), Suspension (5 issues), Tyres (2 issues), Steering (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 21 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))”; “Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))”; “Offside Front Tyre has a lump, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure cracked (5.2.3 (d) (ii))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY