DVLA verified

SUBARU IMPREZA2001 · 2.0L PETROL

X357 LGW

Vehicle Insight Summary

Considering this 2001 SUBARU IMPREZA? It's a PETROL with a 1994cc engine showing 141,584 miles. MOT is not recorded and it's not currently taxed. View the full DVLA history below.

MOT
Expired
Expires 13/03/2013
Tax
Untaxed
Expires 01/02/2013
Fuel
PETROL
Year
2001
Engine
1994cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The most recent MOT, dated 14 March 2012, resulted in a pass at 141 584 miles, but the tester noted that the front brake disc was pitted. Looking back, the vehicle failed the MOT just two days earlier on 12 March 2012. The failure listed a badly damaged nearside front road wheel, an insecure nearside front anti‑roll bar linkage, both windscreen wipers not clearing the screen effectively, and the same pitted front brake disc. Subsequent passes in January 2012, January 2011 and January 2010 recorded a rusted rear exhaust box, tyre tread close to the legal limit, and slight deterioration of the rear exhaust system. The pattern shows that the front brake disc pitting persisted through both a fail and a later pass, while the wheel damage, anti‑roll bar linkage insecurity and wiper effectiveness issues were noted only in the fail and are not mentioned in later passes, suggesting they may have been repaired. The exhaust system shows a progression from slight deterioration to a rusted box over the two‑year span, indicating a slow‑developing corrosion issue. Overall, the trend appears to be improving for the items that caused the failure, but the brake disc pitting and exhaust rust point to ongoing corrosion‑related concerns. With roughly 5 660 miles per year, the mileage is low for a 25‑year‑old car. Low use can mean less wear on moving parts but also longer periods of standing, which encourages corrosion of brake discs, exhaust components and rubber items such as wiper blades. A buyer should first examine the front brake discs for pitting or scoring, check the condition of both windscreen wipers and their arms, inspect the nearside front wheel for any cracks or damage, look for play or insecurity in the nearside front anti‑roll bar linkage, and inspect the rear exhaust system for rust or holes.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

60
/ 100 · Average

Public record health check: Average.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
✓ Taxed
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
! Older vehicle
A score of 60 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for X357LGW

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The most recent MOT, dated 14 March 2012, resulted in a pass at 141 584 miles, but the tester noted that the front brake disc was pitted. Looking back, the vehicle failed the MOT just two days earlier on 12 March 2012. The failure listed a badly damaged nearside front road wheel, an insecure nearside front anti‑roll bar linkage, both windscreen wipers not clearing the screen effectively, and the same pitted front brake disc. Subsequent passes in January 2012, January 2011 and January 2010 recorded a rusted rear exhaust box, tyre tread close to the legal limit, and slight deterioration of the rear exhaust system. The pattern shows that the front brake disc pitting persisted through both a fail and a later pass, while the wheel damage, anti‑roll bar linkage insecurity and wiper effectiveness issues were noted only in the fail and are not mentioned in later passes, suggesting they may have been repaired. The exhaust system shows a progression from slight deterioration to a rusted box over the two‑year span, indicating a slow‑developing corrosion issue. Overall, the trend appears to be improving for the items that caused the failure, but the brake disc pitting and exhaust rust point to ongoing corrosion‑related concerns. With roughly 5 660 miles per year, the mileage is low for a 25‑year‑old car. Low use can mean less wear on moving parts but also longer periods of standing, which encourages corrosion of brake discs, exhaust components and rubber items such as wiper blades. A buyer should first examine the front brake discs for pitting or scoring, check the condition of both windscreen wipers and their arms, inspect the nearside front wheel for any cracks or damage, look for play or insecurity in the nearside front anti‑roll bar linkage, and inspect the rear exhaust system for rust or holes.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Registered in 2001, this Subaru Impreza with plate X357 LGW has undergone 5 MOT inspections since January 2010.

Across its entire MOT history, this Subaru has a 80% success rate (4 passes and 1 fails). This is a strong MOT track record, suggesting the vehicle has been well-maintained.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Windscreen (2 issues), Brakes (2 issues), Lighting (1 issue), Tyres (1 issue), Exhaust & Emissions (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 2 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 4 failure items have been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)”; “Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)”; “Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage insecure (2.4.G.1)”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY