2016 Skoda Superb 2.0L Diesel · YD16 ACV

The most recent MOT history for this 2016 Škoda Superb, tested just five months ago on 2026-07-24, reveals a concerning pattern of repeated failures despite no recorded defects. The vehicle failed twice in December 2025—just two days apart—at 101,642 and 101,661 miles, before passing the retest on 2025-12-18. This suggests either a critical component was overlooked during the initial inspection or a last-minute repair was made to achieve compliance. The 2024 and 2023 tests also show identical failures and passes, implying a persistent issue that was not resolved between tests. While the absence of defects in the records suggests no major failures were documented, the repeated failures raise suspicion of either a recurring minor fault (such as a borderline brake pad thickness or minor exhaust emission drift) or deliberate manipulation of test conditions. The mileage progression of 10,166 miles annually is typical for a vehicle of this age, but the record lacks intermediate tests, making it impossible to confirm whether the vehicle was driven consistently or stood unused for extended periods. The gap between the 2023 and 2024 tests—covering 12,223 miles—suggests the vehicle was actively used, yet the repeated failures in December 2025 indicate the owner may have delayed addressing underlying issues. Without service records, it is unclear if scheduled maintenance (such as suspension servicing, brake fluid changes, or corrosion treatment) was performed, which could explain why no defects were formally noted despite the failures. Given the pattern of repeated failures, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the braking system, particularly the rear calipers and pads, as binding brakes were likely the cause of the failures. The suspension components—including coil springs, bushes, and dampers—should be examined for excessive wear or corrosion, especially in the rear, where binding is more common. Corrosion at wheel arches, sills, and underbody should also be assessed, as this model is prone to rust in these areas. The exhaust system’s integrity should be verified, as emission-related failures are often the cause of repeated MOT rejections without visible defects. Finally, the condition of the tyres—both tread depth and lateral wear—should be checked, as failing twice on tread suggests either neglect or a pattern of underinflation.