2010 Mazda 2 1.5L Petrol · AW07 RAM

This Mazda 2 has maintained a consistent MOT pass record with no defects recorded across five consecutive tests, most recently passing on 8 July 2025 at 72,858 miles. The absence of advisories or failings indicates the vehicle has not experienced recurring mechanical issues during the standard MOT checks, though this does not preclude hidden wear or deferred maintenance. The most recent test was conducted just over a year ago, which is within the acceptable window for a vehicle of this age, though buyers should verify whether the current owner has adhered to any advisory repairs from previous tests—none were logged in this record. The mileage progression suggests unusually light usage for a vehicle of this vintage, averaging just 4,554 miles annually over the past six years. This pattern could imply prolonged periods of storage or limited driving, which may have mitigated some wear but could also mean deferred servicing for non-MOT-critical components. The most notable gap is between the 2021 and 2022 tests, where mileage increased by only 4,920 miles over a year, reinforcing the low-usage trend. While this reduces concerns about excessive mechanical strain, it also raises questions about whether routine servicing—such as fluid changes, suspension lubrication, or timing belt inspection—was performed on schedule. Given the clean MOT history, the primary focus for an in-person inspection should centre on suspension integrity, particularly the condition of coil springs, bushes, and shock absorbers, as these are not routinely tested but degrade predictably over time. The brakes, though not flagged, warrant close scrutiny for uneven wear, binding calipers, or corrosion on the rear discs—common issues in lightly driven vehicles where moisture accelerates rust. Examine the underbody for signs of structural corrosion, especially around the sills, subframe, and rear axle, as prolonged standing can exacerbate water ingress. Tyre tread depth and lateral wear should also be checked, as the lack of MOT defects on this front suggests either recent replacement or consistent underinflation, which could compromise handling. The absence of advisories in the MOT record is reassuring, but buyers must treat this as a baseline rather than a guarantee. The vehicle’s age and low mileage necessitate thorough checks of non-MOT components, particularly those prone to neglect in lightly used cars. Documented servicing records would further clarify whether critical maintenance—such as timing belt replacement or differential fluid changes—has been addressed. Without such evidence, the buyer should proceed with cautious optimism, prioritising a professional pre-purchase inspection.