2016 BMW 218 2.0L Diesel · AX16 KZR

A pattern of tyre deterioration and rear‑brake wear dominates the MOT record for this 2016 BMW 218, highlighted by a 2024 failure for a non‑functioning tyre‑pressure monitoring system and a series of advisories over the last five years concerning cracked or perished front tyres, thin rear‑brake pads and mildly corroded rear discs. The most recent test on 12 December 2025 recorded a pass, but the near‑side front tyre was again flagged for slight damage and cracking, confirming that the tyre condition issue has persisted despite interim passes. With only 24 436 miles recorded over a ten‑year lifespan, the vehicle averages roughly 2 400 miles per annum – a mileage level that is considerably below typical usage for a BMW of this age. Such low annual accumulation often points to periods of limited driving or extended storage, which can accelerate tyre ageing and rubber hardening irrespective of distance travelled. The consistent appearance of tyre‑related advisories suggests that calendar ageing, rather than mileage wear, is the primary factor affecting the tyre rubber, while the repeated rear‑brake pad advisories indicate that the braking system has experienced sufficient use or corrosion to approach the minimum thickness limits despite the low overall mileage. Prospective buyers should give the tyre set a thorough visual and tactile inspection. Look for sidewall cracks, tread separation, and any bulges on the near‑side front tyre that was repeatedly noted as perished, and compare the DOT manufacture dates on all four tyres to ensure none exceed six years of age. Verify that the TPMS sensors are operational by checking for a steady TPMS indicator after the engine is started and the vehicle is stationary; a malfunctioning sensor could re‑trigger a failure. Any tyre showing significant cracking or age‑related degradation should be replaced before regular use, and the TPMS system should be recalibrated or its sensors replaced as required. The rear braking assembly warrants close attention. Measure the remaining thickness of both rear pads; the MOT advisories for “thin” pads suggest they may be near the legal minimum and could require replacement. Inspect the rear discs for surface pitting or rust that could affect pad contact, and listen for any squeal or judder when applying the brakes during a test drive. While braking, note any pedal feel changes, such as a spongy or uneven response, which could indicate pad wear or disc corrosion. A comprehensive pre‑purchase inspection that includes a brake pad thickness check, disc surface evaluation, and verification of TPMS functionality will provide a clearer picture of the immediate remedial work needed to bring the vehicle to a reliable road‑worthy state.